1.8 sec in total
27 ms
1.5 sec
303 ms
Visit rlf.legal now to see the best up-to-date Rlf content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rlf.legal
Call Rodriguez Law Firm Now For A Free Consultation With The Top Car Accident, Personal Injury Lawyers. Over 160+ Five Star Reviews.
Visit rlf.legalWe analyzed Rlf.legal page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rlf.legal performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value8,030 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
27 ms
402 ms
26 ms
37 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rlf.legal, 77% (53 requests) were made to Rodriguezlawfirm.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (648 ms) relates to the external source Rodriguezlawfirm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 450.6 kB (15%)
3.0 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Rlf.legal main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 398.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 398.4 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rlf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 88 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rlf.legal has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (67%)
61
20
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rlf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rlf.legal
27 ms
rodriguezlawfirm.com
402 ms
styles.css
26 ms
style.min.css
37 ms
style.min.css
50 ms
basic.min.css
49 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
55 ms
theme.min.css
52 ms
frontend.min.css
56 ms
general.min.css
55 ms
e04409987a197ba883db1753a2b804c7.min.css
100 ms
language-cookie.js
68 ms
jquery.min.js
78 ms
jquery.json.min.js
65 ms
gravityforms.min.js
68 ms
utils.min.js
70 ms
api.js
69 ms
138260569598195.js
81 ms
domain_215288bc_189f_41ad_9d2e_6907a6c0d6e4.js
594 ms
js
73 ms
js
533 ms
swap.js
69 ms
attributer.js
56 ms
js
534 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
70 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
75 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
72 ms
dom-ready.min.js
73 ms
hooks.min.js
82 ms
i18n.min.js
91 ms
a11y.min.js
86 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
91 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
522 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
523 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
524 ms
general.min.js
524 ms
akismet-frontend.js
523 ms
a1860eef06b0f082921ea0133d386207.min.js
526 ms
fbevents.js
440 ms
events.js
524 ms
gtm.js
436 ms
Logo.png
347 ms
stars.png
346 ms
Screen-Shot-2022-09-06-at-7.47.03-PM.png
348 ms
Screen-Shot-2022-09-06-at-7.46.45-PM.png
347 ms
Screen-Shot-2022-09-06-at-7.46.55-PM.png
346 ms
1607639136-nbc.png.webp
349 ms
Forbes.webp
648 ms
Logo-icon.png
348 ms
image0.png
348 ms
1601310623-accolade1.png
348 ms
1601310633-accolade2.png
422 ms
1607637812-vehicle-trial-lawyers.png
422 ms
1601310638-accolade3.png.jpeg
422 ms
1601403628-accolade4.png
422 ms
1600119065-logo-nav.png
421 ms
usa.png
423 ms
es.png
422 ms
AvenirNext-Regular.woff
408 ms
Fazillah-Dago2-1C5A2237-TOP-scaled.jpg
149 ms
awb-icons.woff
76 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
441 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
301 ms
client.js
91 ms
main.MTJhNGMzN2YwMQ.js
45 ms
avada-classic.ttf
45 ms
avada-classic.ttf
45 ms
recaptcha__en.js
57 ms
external_forms.js
81 ms
rlf.legal accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
rlf.legal best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rlf.legal SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rlf.legal can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rlf.legal main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rlf.legal
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rlf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: