Tools & Wizards About Us
roar.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

roar.co.uk

Domain parking page

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

410 ms

Resources Loaded

659 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

roar.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit roar.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Roar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roar.co.uk

Visit roar.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Roar.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 659 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roar.co.uk performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roar.co.uk

410 ms

park.js

202 ms

show_afd_ads.js

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Roar.co.uk, 33% (1 request) were made to Sedoparking.com and 33% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (410 ms) belongs to the original domain Roar.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 762 B (26%)

Content Size

2.9 kB

After Optimization

2.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Roar.co.uk main page is 2.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 664 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 516 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 664 B or 56% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 98 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roar. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

roar.co.uk

roar.co.uk

410 ms

park.js

park.js

202 ms

show_afd_ads.js

show_afd_ads.js

18 ms

Accessibility Review

roar.co.uk accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

roar.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

roar.co.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roar.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roar.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

roar.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Roar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: