1.6 sec in total
152 ms
1.2 sec
278 ms
Visit roc-p.com now to see the best up-to-date ROC P content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roc-p.com
You don’t have to use multiple systems to keep track of your organization’s certification data. Find the robust system you need with ROC-P.
Visit roc-p.comWe analyzed Roc-p.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
roc-p.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value2,210 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
152 ms
57 ms
64 ms
51 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Roc-p.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (390 ms) belongs to the original domain Roc-p.com.
Page size can be reduced by 37.4 kB (15%)
246.8 kB
209.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Roc-p.com main page is 246.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 130.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ROC P images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roc-p.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (51%)
43
21
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ROC P. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.roc-p.com
152 ms
bootstrap.min.css
57 ms
custom.min.css
64 ms
jquery-1.11.2.js
51 ms
embed.js
34 ms
main.min.js
101 ms
project.js
47 ms
v2.js
91 ms
21390478.js
91 ms
index.js
91 ms
gtm.js
122 ms
bkghero2.webp
213 ms
logo.png
77 ms
hero-dashboard.webp
78 ms
color-blocks.png
146 ms
color-blocks-2.png
75 ms
curve.png
76 ms
ico-clock.webp
75 ms
ico-13.webp
190 ms
ico-7.webp
388 ms
feature-powerful.webp
390 ms
quote-michelle.jpg
196 ms
ICE-Member-Logo.webp
192 ms
quotes.png
232 ms
21390478.js
323 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
161 ms
collectedforms.js
161 ms
fb.js
161 ms
banner.js
164 ms
js
77 ms
analytics.js
153 ms
insight.min.js
228 ms
bat.js
210 ms
h2c712yk3k
227 ms
fbevents.js
142 ms
21390478.js
202 ms
events.js
60 ms
events.js
168 ms
collect
40 ms
insight.old.min.js
17 ms
clarity.js
32 ms
collect
54 ms
saq_pxl
17 ms
collect
6 ms
c.gif
8 ms
roc-p.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
roc-p.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
roc-p.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roc-p.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roc-p.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roc-p.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ROC P. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: