6.1 sec in total
87 ms
5.6 sec
373 ms
Click here to check amazing Rochesterwebpages content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rochesterwebpages.com
Visit rochesterwebpages.comWe analyzed Rochesterwebpages.com page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rochesterwebpages.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value16.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value4,430 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.302
39/100
15%
Value20.2 s
2/100
10%
87 ms
162 ms
229 ms
44 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rochesterwebpages.com, 78% (66 requests) were made to Bluetowertech.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Bluetowertech.com.
Page size can be reduced by 443.9 kB (28%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Rochesterwebpages.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rochesterwebpages images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 344.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 344.2 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 562 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rochesterwebpages.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (81%)
77
15
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rochesterwebpages. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rochesterwebpages.com
87 ms
www.rochesterwebpages.com
162 ms
bluetowertech.com
229 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
12b6e3fe9639c7aab85576dc0d42e4e1.css
71 ms
ff37ef5863a4a8994a29a1596982a375.css
107 ms
css
45 ms
27f1928774d4abc882b225c2b839145f.css
105 ms
f8c5734b993943cf4e4e00033a1c12e2.css
78 ms
3b665c590699e0635e2f703f845a30ed.css
97 ms
f58fc338d6da022abe486cbcd02cbf73.css
100 ms
a398d79c54e5401240bb237a1ebed709.css
103 ms
4bfe03130fc158d40a7b8e954cca100d.css
110 ms
cf224431916be3aa8b57124fb38b9d82.css
113 ms
53fbdd7740752472715e705d68a829eb.css
143 ms
4fd4dd6f2c7ae18cbbc6ae8534045902.css
129 ms
a2ea7c3bb996f27787d2ba69d243eb3e.css
140 ms
d33ac0d1f4e51932d81b4c81ba1e998f.css
149 ms
032e226d3122aaba32f79a0c00bc6162.css
206 ms
jquery.min.js
181 ms
8ec0705cee23e64f33356ed3beff4d3f.js
162 ms
f8adbeb79eda91f364b68827218d0201.js
224 ms
375c882b6c86cbd3a82e6091943c4346.js
175 ms
b150098c8db64c9db34d6a183e7f97e8.js
182 ms
fe44686bb0faca975910342dcbcf61b9.js
193 ms
css
24 ms
892a74babb6f77d143c5af59ba5e10ce.js
247 ms
49b372c95790319cfb857b3a5287b7f0.js
231 ms
jquery.min.js
56 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
9 ms
2a7298a92a6799789dd3889bea028ac0.js
223 ms
41ca09790a93c0f875e0d5f4e9381a3e.js
226 ms
d9311a34df80e8f0f4d4398d60c6e989.js
238 ms
d03ecf7a02e8e40635ec7a1b8c9895b8.css
244 ms
e41f433d2c106baa9e2502fe6fc06d03.css
250 ms
d4db18e92d7e4259c5c005a91103a67f.css
256 ms
fc7caa223041a7744814ca5a16f3b9aa.js
265 ms
e47461f1ee7e515a75ab17e7f72f01b9.js
270 ms
e54327520e04ec9472ccd0ccbba615f5.js
278 ms
4e522df235a81bdaeaddde1eed26e5e4.js
278 ms
892a74babb6f77d143c5af59ba5e10ce.js
314 ms
49b372c95790319cfb857b3a5287b7f0.js
287 ms
107690f1d503a5e99ea0083a9c09535d.js
300 ms
api.js
46 ms
api.js
69 ms
6e6a00c63e17cae66aed78586d8ddc2e.js
303 ms
1ba911f5cb8745cda38fe5fcd8f2afbe.js
285 ms
bd1ed16e95a945d87881cad5db70cf39.js
241 ms
2a83f2d7907d168f2495aae0941d5012.js
252 ms
11a61a869a3b2d9adf6f298f1f10c5d1.js
266 ms
28209df6883b6e2e445c3487397c706e.js
244 ms
b8179182ce02ec83fd1d04e6abcb49da.js
249 ms
d7e28d1bbd8b46870154a164e63e8b67.js
251 ms
97c3061a574f94d042b4fac4dc177de0.js
250 ms
cf6885ec685b85ae0dfe108a77dc4e5a.js
249 ms
cd8aa64db0cb899a094818ec14885886.js
250 ms
fonts.css
244 ms
b6c3bcf2a7f7ea176428c6b47e3fdfe2.js
386 ms
cdf541af701e1f1d5f95006b4b5ced73.js
384 ms
1bdb834d5408bc329fe46fd309104368.js
371 ms
gtm.js
180 ms
logo-1.png
457 ms
bluetower-banner-background.jpg
172 ms
750px-Artificial_Intelligence__AI__Machine_Learning_-_302124110481.jpg
173 ms
20180811_OPP510-e1596474731188.jpg
168 ms
blog_03.jpg
168 ms
embed
110 ms
Museo300-Regular.woff
93 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
95 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
95 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
90 ms
js
145 ms
8a9982067352eced0173534b2daf14ba.js
327 ms
recaptcha__en.js
162 ms
mejs-controls.svg
136 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
123 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
125 ms
search.js
35 ms
geometry.js
114 ms
main.js
117 ms
font
127 ms
loader.gif
46 ms
2019-04-04_19-12-07.png
2391 ms
submit-spin.svg
39 ms
logo_white.png
35 ms
rochesterwebpages.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
rochesterwebpages.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rochesterwebpages.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rochesterwebpages.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rochesterwebpages.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rochesterwebpages.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rochesterwebpages. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: