Tools & Wizards About Us
rockandwall.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

rockandwall.com

Home | Home Builders Chicago | Apartments for Rent Chicago | Kitchen Remodeling Chicago

Page Load Speed

471 ms in total

First Response

91 ms

Resources Loaded

221 ms

Page Rendered

159 ms

rockandwall.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rockandwall.com now to see the best up-to-date Rockandwall content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rockandwall.com

Home Builders, Apartments for Rent - For more than 35 years Rock and Wall Construction has brought unique designs to life. Learn more about our award winning designs.

Visit rockandwall.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rockandwall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 380 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rockandwall.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rockandwall.com

91 ms

class.css

30 ms

crains.jpg

40 ms

chicgo.jpg

41 ms

metro.jpg

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Rockandwall.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (96 ms) belongs to the original domain Rockandwall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.6 kB (3%)

Content Size

432.9 kB

After Optimization

421.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rockandwall.com main page is 432.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 401.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 7.9 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 401.6 kB
  • After minification 399.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rockandwall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockandwall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rockandwall. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

rockandwall.com

rockandwall.com

91 ms

class.css

class.css

30 ms

crains.jpg

crains.jpg

40 ms

chicgo.jpg

chicgo.jpg

41 ms

metro.jpg

metro.jpg

41 ms

property1.jpg

property1.jpg

80 ms

property2.jpg

property2.jpg

81 ms

recentproject.jpg

recentproject.jpg

84 ms

Design-Evanston-copy.jpg

Design-Evanston-copy.jpg

82 ms

ga.js

ga.js

8 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

46 ms

bodybg.png

bodybg.png

45 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

47 ms

rhtbh.jpg

rhtbh.jpg

48 ms

aboutimg.jpg

aboutimg.jpg

96 ms

homecontentbg.jpg

homecontentbg.jpg

78 ms

rentalbg.jpg

rentalbg.jpg

50 ms

submit.png

submit.png

63 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

rockandwall.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rockandwall.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rockandwall.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockandwall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rockandwall.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rockandwall.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rockandwall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: