Tools & Wizards About Us
rosekervick.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

rosekervick.com

Home | My Site 1

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

182 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

455 ms

rosekervick.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rosekervick.com now to see the best up-to-date Rosekervick content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rosekervick.com

Visit rosekervick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rosekervick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rosekervick.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,240 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rosekervick.com

182 ms

rosekervick.com

420 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

84 ms

woocommerce.css

170 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Rosekervick.com, 20% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Assets.calendly.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (756 ms) belongs to the original domain Rosekervick.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 243.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rosekervick.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 68.2 kB

  • Original 85.7 kB
  • After minification 83.1 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 166.0 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rosekervick needs image optimization as it can save up to 166.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 210 B

  • Original 630.0 kB
  • After minification 630.0 kB
  • After compression 629.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 340.5 kB
  • After minification 340.5 kB
  • After compression 331.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rosekervick.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (67%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rosekervick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rosekervick.com

rosekervick.com

182 ms

rosekervick.com

rosekervick.com

420 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

84 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

170 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

241 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

249 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

256 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

263 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

275 ms

global.css

global.css

271 ms

post-14.css

post-14.css

319 ms

post-17.css

post-17.css

334 ms

post-53.css

post-53.css

336 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

345 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

352 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

355 ms

css

css

36 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

399 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

501 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

426 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

428 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

431 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

434 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

478 ms

js

js

69 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

543 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

545 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

546 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

547 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

624 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

625 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

624 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

625 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

625 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

625 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

639 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

678 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

750 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

679 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

679 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

601 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

556 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

529 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

513 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

516 ms

css2

css2

35 ms

discovery-call

discovery-call

415 ms

logo.png

logo.png

332 ms

Homepage-3-.png

Homepage-3-.png

756 ms

Asset-6-8.png

Asset-6-8.png

311 ms

Asset-7-8.png

Asset-7-8.png

324 ms

Asset-8-8.png

Asset-8-8.png

326 ms

Asset-9-8.png

Asset-9-8.png

331 ms

close-up-businessman-with-digital-tablet-1024x683.jpg

close-up-businessman-with-digital-tablet-1024x683.jpg

547 ms

NK0vctgK_400x400.jpg

NK0vctgK_400x400.jpg

404 ms

supervalu.jpg

supervalu.jpg

405 ms

axa.jpg

axa.jpg

413 ms

Hannah-Wrixon-5x-2.jpg

Hannah-Wrixon-5x-2.jpg

491 ms

buymedia.jpg

buymedia.jpg

484 ms

irish-homecare.jpg

irish-homecare.jpg

483 ms

footer-logo.png

footer-logo.png

570 ms

IOD_Logo_RGB_Colour.png

IOD_Logo_RGB_Colour.png

721 ms

Enterprise-Ireland-Logo-1.png

Enterprise-Ireland-Logo-1.png

703 ms

Asset-2-8.png

Asset-2-8.png

536 ms

Asset-12-8.png

Asset-12-8.png

595 ms

Asset-14-8.png

Asset-14-8.png

617 ms

Asset-15-8.png

Asset-15-8.png

617 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJ3GmP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJ3GmP9.ttf

16 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJ3GlP6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJ3GlP6Foo.ttf

32 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJFGmP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJFGmP9.ttf

90 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJFGlP6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJFGlP6Foo.ttf

50 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KIpGmP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KIpGmP9.ttf

45 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KIpGlP6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KIpGlP6Foo.ttf

49 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KL3GmP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KL3GmP9.ttf

63 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KL3GlP6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KL3GlP6Foo.ttf

63 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJ3G2P9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJ3G2P9.ttf

63 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJ3G1P6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KJ3G1P6Foo.ttf

63 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKpHWP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKpHWP9.ttf

103 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKpHVP6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKpHVP6Foo.ttf

63 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKQHWP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKQHWP9.ttf

65 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKQHVP6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKQHVP6Foo.ttf

64 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KL3HWP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KL3HWP9.ttf

65 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KL3HVP6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KL3HVP6Foo.ttf

66 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KLeHWP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KLeHWP9.ttf

66 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KLeHVP6Foo.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KLeHVP6Foo.ttf

64 ms

GothamBook.ttf

GothamBook.ttf

672 ms

GothamBold.ttf

GothamBold.ttf

614 ms

GothamMediumItalic.ttf

GothamMediumItalic.ttf

620 ms

booking-e3441a13.css

booking-e3441a13.css

201 ms

booking-runtime-d14c20d4.js

booking-runtime-d14c20d4.js

345 ms

booking-c795e890.js

booking-c795e890.js

411 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

80 ms

Accessibility Review

rosekervick.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rosekervick.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rosekervick.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rosekervick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rosekervick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rosekervick.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rosekervick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: