8.7 sec in total
723 ms
6.7 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to rosemark.net homepage info - get ready to check Rosemark best content right away, or after learning these important things about rosemark.net
Obgyn experts in Idaho Falls provide a wide range of obgyn healthcare services for women. Full obgyn care for each stage of a woman's life.
Visit rosemark.netWe analyzed Rosemark.net page load time and found that the first response time was 723 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
rosemark.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.267
46/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
723 ms
27 ms
227 ms
294 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Rosemark.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rosemark.net.
Page size can be reduced by 976.9 kB (60%)
1.6 MB
655.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rosemark.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 705.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rosemark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 264.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 264.0 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 625.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rosemark.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 625.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (67%)
60
20
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rosemark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rosemark.net
723 ms
css2
27 ms
classic-themes.min.css
227 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
294 ms
style.css
367 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
295 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
657 ms
swiper.min.css
377 ms
post-50.css
439 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
1233 ms
post-4.css
516 ms
ecs-style.css
589 ms
post-1229.css
598 ms
jquery.min.js
951 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
737 ms
ecs_ajax_pagination.js
811 ms
ecs.js
818 ms
js
57 ms
js
35 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
663 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
741 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1168 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
822 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
882 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1112 ms
hooks.min.js
961 ms
i18n.min.js
1168 ms
frontend.min.js
1307 ms
waypoints.min.js
1312 ms
core.min.js
1418 ms
frontend.min.js
1465 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1509 ms
banner1_w4vwvv.avif
270 ms
background-rm.jpg
384 ms
header-bg.jpg
530 ms
Logo.png
545 ms
hamburger-icon.svg
557 ms
search3.svg
604 ms
icon-users.svg
628 ms
icon-paybill.svg
673 ms
forms.svg
751 ms
Obstetrics_1-1.svg
765 ms
Gynecology_1-1.svg
778 ms
Aesthetics_1-1.svg
824 ms
Specialties_1-1.svg
852 ms
Research-1.svg
893 ms
Newly-pregnant-banner.webp
1117 ms
laser-hair-removal-idaho-falls-2024-Valentine.jpg
1277 ms
Galderma-fillers-winter-sale-idaho-falls-1.jpg
1435 ms
facebook.svg
1043 ms
icon-instagram.svg
1071 ms
icon-google.svg
1113 ms
otis-redding.png
151 ms
80 ms
quotemark.svg
1156 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
89 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff
159 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9aXw.woff
108 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6aXw.woff
123 ms
js
79 ms
js
88 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
170 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
27 ms
rosemark.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
rosemark.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rosemark.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rosemark.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rosemark.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rosemark.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rosemark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: