7.7 sec in total
1.6 sec
5.1 sec
1 sec
Welcome to rotex24.ru homepage info - get ready to check Rotex 24 best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about rotex24.ru
Visit rotex24.ruWe analyzed Rotex24.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rotex24.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value19.4 s
0/100
10%
Value2,620 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value20.4 s
2/100
10%
1566 ms
261 ms
279 ms
26 ms
279 ms
Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Rotex24.ru, 27% (31 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 12% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rotex24.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (58%)
5.1 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rotex24.ru main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 280.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rotex 24 needs image optimization as it can save up to 280.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rotex24.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (55%)
96
43
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rotex 24. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rotex24.ru
1566 ms
language-selector.css
261 ms
layerslider.css
279 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
279 ms
settings.css
279 ms
navigation.css
281 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
281 ms
cms-navigation.css
388 ms
theme-styles.min.css
530 ms
pe-line-icons.min.css
396 ms
font-awesome.min.css
404 ms
icomoon-fonts.min.css
406 ms
theme-icons.min.css
411 ms
css
33 ms
style.css
521 ms
custom.css
527 ms
frontend.css
541 ms
js_composer.css
819 ms
jquery.js
814 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
652 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
794 ms
greensock.js
793 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
673 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
920 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
946 ms
head-scripts.js
926 ms
jsapi
18 ms
maps.js
926 ms
js
20 ms
jquery.form.min.js
830 ms
scripts.js
833 ms
core.min.js
933 ms
widget.min.js
939 ms
tabs.min.js
939 ms
comment-reply.min.js
960 ms
scripts-vendors.js
1550 ms
smoothscroll.js
966 ms
sitepress.js
1063 ms
jquerytransit.js
1068 ms
js_composer_front.js
1068 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
949 ms
theme-styles.min-blessed1.css
842 ms
js
26 ms
logo_big2.png
529 ms
ru.png
335 ms
en.png
339 ms
cvety-e1456944413721-mnciv5rsnfinh5dqke91nipea43awf3t79b1qt9blk.jpg
880 ms
20030223-e1455891378793-mmrb4dmjyr8g0533s4i7g8cp1wddp3q7cq1qei1nnc.jpg
682 ms
award_split_banner-mmf8q6ugwfqetwfdtfk5fh2se70ew77cmvliy0xz3s.png
682 ms
captcha.php
339 ms
rotexback2.jpg
1525 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
14 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
72 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
69 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
71 ms
theme-icons.woff
464 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
616 ms
fonts-icomoon.woff
591 ms
Pe-icon-line.woff
731 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
70 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
67 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
68 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
71 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
71 ms
sky1.jpg
798 ms
ajax-loader.gif
461 ms
common.js
49 ms
map.js
50 ms
util.js
47 ms
marker.js
48 ms
onion.js
36 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
29 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
123 ms
stats.js
23 ms
controls.js
18 ms
infowindow.js
17 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
97 ms
transparent.png
44 ms
css
23 ms
rotexpin.png
155 ms
google4.png
52 ms
mapcnt6.png
48 ms
sv5.png
48 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
51 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
56 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
56 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
55 ms
tmapctrl.png
56 ms
cb_scout5.png
57 ms
tmapctrl4.png
57 ms
imgs8.png
57 ms
vt
57 ms
vt
61 ms
vt
44 ms
vt
45 ms
vt
46 ms
vt
43 ms
vt
60 ms
vt
66 ms
vt
66 ms
vt
68 ms
vt
69 ms
vt
78 ms
vt
88 ms
vt
97 ms
vt
97 ms
vt
99 ms
vt
101 ms
vt
102 ms
vt
111 ms
vt
126 ms
vt
117 ms
vt
122 ms
rotex24.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rotex24.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rotex24.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rotex24.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rotex24.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rotex24.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rotex 24. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: