Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

royalfoam.us

Architectural Accents | Monument signs | Royal Foam US | Jacksonville

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

191 ms

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

88 ms

royalfoam.us screenshot

About Website

Welcome to royalfoam.us homepage info - get ready to check Royal Foam best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about royalfoam.us

Custom Architectural Accents & Monument Signs any sizes engineered and fabricated for your unique design Royal Foam Factory Call (904) 345-5400

Visit royalfoam.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Royalfoam.us page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royalfoam.us performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,850 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.royalfoam.us

191 ms

minified.js

101 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

178 ms

polyfill.min.js

941 ms

js

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 160 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Royalfoam.us, 60% (96 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 12% (19 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (27%)

Content Size

5.5 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Royalfoam.us main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 917.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 202.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 917.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 497.4 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Royal Foam needs image optimization as it can save up to 497.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

  • Original 348.2 kB
  • After minification 348.2 kB
  • After compression 299.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (28%)

Requests Now

134

After Optimization

97

The browser has sent 134 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Foam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

royalfoam.us accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

royalfoam.us best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

royalfoam.us SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalfoam.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royalfoam.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Royal Foam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: