996 ms in total
96 ms
429 ms
471 ms
Visit rpf-ie.org now to see the best up-to-date Rpf Ie content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rpf-ie.org
Visit rpf-ie.orgWe analyzed Rpf-ie.org page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 900 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rpf-ie.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
96/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value760 ms
38/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.8 s
45/100
10%
96 ms
39 ms
50 ms
38 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Rpf-ie.org, 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (252 ms) belongs to the original domain Rpf-ie.org.
Page size can be reduced by 94.4 kB (14%)
686.1 kB
591.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Rpf-ie.org main page is 686.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 444.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.6 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rpf Ie images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpf-ie.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (21%)
52
41
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rpf Ie. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rpf-ie.org
96 ms
common.css
39 ms
shop-new.css
50 ms
msma.css
38 ms
bootstrap.min.css
40 ms
jquery.min.js
54 ms
qazy.js
65 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
88 ms
jquery.base64.min.js
67 ms
product.js
66 ms
search.js
84 ms
en.js
72 ms
shop-new.js
83 ms
en.png
145 ms
22833.jpg
146 ms
t5.png
85 ms
c22727-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
148 ms
c22739-dynapac-cp142-reman-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
148 ms
c22749-asv-sr80-reman-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
147 ms
c22750-pel-job-ls286-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
146 ms
c22764-jcb-300-wheeled-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
146 ms
c22768-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
150 ms
c22809-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
150 ms
c22826-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
151 ms
c22829-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
150 ms
c22767-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
150 ms
c22821-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
154 ms
c22825-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
195 ms
c22820-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
189 ms
c22816-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
202 ms
c22818-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
212 ms
c22822-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
207 ms
c22808-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
199 ms
c22778-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
238 ms
c22824-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
238 ms
c22812-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
236 ms
c22814-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
244 ms
c22810-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
224 ms
c22813-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
228 ms
c22815-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
242 ms
c22811-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
231 ms
c22782-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
229 ms
c22800-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
230 ms
c22801-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
231 ms
c22802-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
239 ms
c22804-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
251 ms
c22807-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
242 ms
c22799-kobelco-yy35d00007f1-hydraulic-final-drive-motor.jpg
252 ms
t5.png
64 ms
tracking.js
64 ms
tel-flag.png
34 ms
slide-flag.png
30 ms
all-cate.png
27 ms
rpf-ie.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rpf-ie.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rpf-ie.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpf-ie.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpf-ie.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rpf-ie.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rpf Ie. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: