5.2 sec in total
993 ms
3.6 sec
623 ms
Visit rtrc.in now to see the best up-to-date Rtrc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtrc.in
RTRC Limited is FDAS Accredited and BIS Recognized laboratory and can test all kinds of Cables, Wires & Transformers including LV and MV Cables up to 66 kVE, Power Distribution Transformers upto 2.5 M...
Visit rtrc.inWe analyzed Rtrc.in page load time and found that the first response time was 993 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rtrc.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.7 s
0/100
10%
Value76.8 s
0/100
25%
Value23.0 s
0/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.258
48/100
15%
Value34.2 s
0/100
10%
993 ms
30 ms
36 ms
28 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Rtrc.in, 16% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (993 ms) belongs to the original domain Rtrc.in.
Page size can be reduced by 3.7 MB (10%)
37.6 MB
33.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Rtrc.in main page is 37.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 36.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtrc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 521.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 521.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 741.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtrc.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 741.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (43%)
76
43
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtrc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rtrc.in
993 ms
style.min.css
30 ms
animate.css
36 ms
styles.css
28 ms
style.css
49 ms
magnific-popup.css
24 ms
css
92 ms
style.css
35 ms
dflip.min.css
37 ms
jquery.min.js
41 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
37 ms
ays-pb-public.js
36 ms
jquery.dd.js
36 ms
cc.main.js
73 ms
bt_elements.js
72 ms
html5shiv.min.js
72 ms
respond.min.js
71 ms
header.misc.js
72 ms
ays-pb-public-min.css
74 ms
comment-reply.min.js
72 ms
dtgsnonce.js
74 ms
index.js
73 ms
index.js
77 ms
slick.min.js
80 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
81 ms
iscroll.js
84 ms
fancySelect.js
82 ms
misc.js
83 ms
dir.hover.js
83 ms
sliders.js
83 ms
bt_parallax.js
84 ms
dflip.min.js
87 ms
api.js
230 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
85 ms
index.js
84 ms
print.css
136 ms
logo-t.png
20 ms
rtrc-ltd.png
20 ms
1-rtrc-building.png
322 ms
2-Impulse-Testing-Setup.png
338 ms
3-High-Voltage-Setup.png
350 ms
4-LOCA-Loss-of-Coolant-Accident-Test-Setup.png
342 ms
5-Thermal-Endurance-Test-Setup.png
379 ms
6-Dynamic-Penetration-Testing.png
334 ms
7-CPR-Construction-Product-Regulation.png
326 ms
Fire-Survial-Testing.png
329 ms
8-Transformer-Testing-Setup.png
344 ms
chemical-testing.png
357 ms
OES-Optical-Emission-Spectrometer.png
355 ms
HPLC-High-Performance-Liquid-Chromatography.png
369 ms
Gas-Cromatography-Mass-Spectrometer-GCMS.png
352 ms
chemical-testing-1.png
373 ms
cable-testing-scaled1.jpg
358 ms
transformer-640x480-1.jpg
359 ms
oil-640x480-1.jpg
359 ms
chemical-640x480-1.jpg
359 ms
metal-640x480-1.jpg
362 ms
water-testing-11.jpg
363 ms
fdas.png
359 ms
iso.png
360 ms
bis.png
362 ms
bsi.png
364 ms
dewa.png
364 ms
background-lab-light.jpg
362 ms
cable-testing1-1.jpg
364 ms
1-rtrc-building-640x267.png
151 ms
2-Impulse-Testing-Setup-640x267.png
29 ms
3-High-Voltage-Setup-640x267.png
37 ms
4-LOCA-Loss-of-Coolant-Accident-Test-Setup-640x267.png
14 ms
5-Thermal-Endurance-Test-Setup-640x267.png
27 ms
6-Dynamic-Penetration-Testing-640x267.png
27 ms
7-CPR-Construction-Product-Regulation-640x267.png
16 ms
Fire-Survial-Testing-640x267.png
27 ms
8-Transformer-Testing-Setup-640x267.png
73 ms
OES-Optical-Emission-Spectrometer-640x267.png
71 ms
HPLC-High-Performance-Liquid-Chromatography-640x267.png
73 ms
Gas-Cromatography-Mass-Spectrometer-GCMS-640x267.png
69 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff
71 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff
72 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff
72 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff
74 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
73 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff
76 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff
180 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
66 ms
Development.ttf
67 ms
CraftEssential.ttf
73 ms
rtrc.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rtrc.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rtrc.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtrc.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtrc.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtrc.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rtrc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: