5.4 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.7 sec
525 ms
Welcome to rucksack.ro homepage info - get ready to check Rucksack best content for Romania right away, or after learning these important things about rucksack.ro
Visit rucksack.roWe analyzed Rucksack.ro page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rucksack.ro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value23.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value1,480 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
1203 ms
383 ms
257 ms
378 ms
384 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rucksack.ro and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rucksack.ro.
Page size can be reduced by 463.6 kB (34%)
1.4 MB
914.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Rucksack.ro main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 784.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rucksack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 268.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 268.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rucksack.ro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 112.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (58%)
60
25
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rucksack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rucksack.ro
1203 ms
events_manager.css
383 ms
meteor-slides.css
257 ms
style.css
378 ms
genericons.css
384 ms
responsive.css
261 ms
upw-theme-standard.min.css
373 ms
style.css
385 ms
basic.css
643 ms
blackwhite.css
498 ms
lightbox.min.css
499 ms
jquery.js
880 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
505 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
519 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
621 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
622 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
631 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
774 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.min.js
749 ms
jquery.ui.menu.min.js
745 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js
751 ms
jquery.ui.resizable.min.js
766 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
869 ms
jquery.ui.button.min.js
913 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.min.js
914 ms
events-manager.js
1058 ms
no-right-click-front.js
915 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
992 ms
jquery.metadata.v2.js
1000 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
998 ms
slideshow.js
997 ms
hoverIntent.js
793 ms
ubermenu.min.js
894 ms
catcheverest-menu.min.js
898 ms
catcheverest-slider.js
909 ms
catcheverest-scrollup.min.js
910 ms
jquery.touchwipe.min.js
920 ms
jquery.lightbox.min.js
939 ms
noise.png
401 ms
copy-logo_rucksack_blog.png
164 ms
contact_ico.png
165 ms
banner.jpg
919 ms
banner-ski_Austria-01.jpg
1097 ms
banner_031.jpg
866 ms
IMG_0421-300x225.jpg
286 ms
P32102571-150x150.jpg
290 ms
Resize-of-2012-08-16-14.44.57-150x150.jpg
411 ms
DSC00932-150x150.jpg
418 ms
Gerlach_02-150x150.jpg
521 ms
IMGP1796-150x150.jpg
659 ms
IMG_0401-150x150.jpg
544 ms
IMG_0227-150x150.jpg
644 ms
IMG_0226-150x150.jpg
671 ms
IMGP1926-150x150.jpg
768 ms
IMG_6493-150x150.jpg
784 ms
IMG_6454-150x150.jpg
797 ms
DSCN1906-150x150.jpg
892 ms
DSC00746-150x150.jpg
908 ms
search.png
923 ms
facebook.png
990 ms
SGLM_logo.png
1014 ms
cropped-logo_rucksack_blog.png
1643 ms
rucksack.ro accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rucksack.ro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rucksack.ro SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RO
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rucksack.ro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rucksack.ro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rucksack.ro
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rucksack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: