8.9 sec in total
2 sec
4.8 sec
2.2 sec
Visit rumputband.com now to see the best up-to-date Rumputband content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rumputband.com
中国建筑材料联合会官网
Visit rumputband.comWe analyzed Rumputband.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rumputband.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.6 s
0/100
10%
Value18.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value450 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
1953 ms
33 ms
53 ms
50 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Rumputband.com, 56% (31 requests) were made to Rumput.org and 9% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Rumput.org.
Page size can be reduced by 874.4 kB (65%)
1.3 MB
475.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rumputband.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 636.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rumputband images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 311.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 311.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 528.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rumputband.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 528.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (66%)
53
18
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rumputband. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rumput.org
1953 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
33 ms
gtranslate-style24.css
53 ms
common-skeleton.min.css
50 ms
tooltip.min.css
19 ms
style.min.css
110 ms
theme.min.css
98 ms
style.css
68 ms
css
107 ms
genericons.css
62 ms
style.css
63 ms
blocks.css
53 ms
jquery.js
103 ms
element.js
101 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.css
81 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.standalone.min.css
101 ms
tribe-events-theme.min.css
82 ms
scripts.js
91 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
93 ms
functions.js
165 ms
wp-embed.min.js
177 ms
logo_heart_translucent_noTagline.png
86 ms
safe_image.php
90 ms
facebook.png
88 ms
rss.png
88 ms
youtube.png
87 ms
instagram.png
87 ms
image-1-1024x600.png
154 ms
image-2-1024x521.png
153 ms
danisendah3-300x200.jpg
205 ms
switcher.png
60 ms
arrow_down.png
60 ms
en.png
54 ms
translateelement.css
36 ms
main.js
78 ms
PVLrKklf1Qw
237 ms
element_main.js
7 ms
Genericons.svg
224 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
5 ms
www-player-vflq-xCVY.css
204 ms
www-embed-player.js
74 ms
base.js
155 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
132 ms
bg_skull.png
61 ms
bg_wheel.png
85 ms
bg_moon.png
62 ms
bg_tree_conifer.png
86 ms
translate_24dp.png
166 ms
ad_status.js
267 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
145 ms
IrvWYL9cMQDdQTlUfy4EmSWPiDUBB4ig0nZVQdwez_Q.js
182 ms
embed.js
68 ms
translate_24dp.png
66 ms
l
73 ms
id
60 ms
rumputband.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rumputband.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rumputband.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rumputband.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rumputband.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rumputband.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rumputband. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: