Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

runnerclick.com

Runnerclick | Runners best source for Reviews, Trends & News!

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

408 ms

runnerclick.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to runnerclick.com homepage info - get ready to check Runnerclick best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about runnerclick.com

We pride ourselves on writing easily readable reviews for all running related products - We also blog about running trends and worldwide running News!

Visit runnerclick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Runnerclick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runnerclick.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,300 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.748

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

runnerclick.com

59 ms

runnerclick.com

66 ms

ads.min.js

257 ms

jquery.min.js

25 ms

affiliate_app_confirm.php

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Runnerclick.com, 27% (21 requests) were made to Media.runnerclick.com and 15% (12 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) relates to the external source Artwork.captivate.fm.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 305.8 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

875.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Runnerclick.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 537.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 163.3 kB

  • Original 201.3 kB
  • After minification 201.3 kB
  • After compression 38.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 537.1 kB
  • After minification 525.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Runnerclick images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 98.3 kB

  • Original 404.0 kB
  • After minification 404.0 kB
  • After compression 305.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 38.9 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runnerclick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (21%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

55

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Runnerclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

runnerclick.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

runnerclick.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

runnerclick.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runnerclick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Runnerclick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Runnerclick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: