Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

running-challenges.co.uk

Running Challenges | Collect badges and complete challenges for running, jogging, walking, and volunteering at your weekly 5k parkrun. This browser ex...

Page Load Speed

641 ms in total

First Response

68 ms

Resources Loaded

283 ms

Page Rendered

290 ms

running-challenges.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Running Challenges content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about running-challenges.co.uk

Collect badges and complete challenges for running, jogging, walking, and volunteering at your weekly 5k parkrun. This browser extension adds extra information to your parkrun results page so you can ...

Visit running-challenges.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Running-challenges.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 573 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

running-challenges.co.uk performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

running-challenges.co.uk

68 ms

running-challenges.co.uk

63 ms

main.css

43 ms

js

64 ms

email-decode.min.js

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Running-challenges.co.uk, 11% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (77 ms) belongs to the original domain Running-challenges.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.3 kB (30%)

Content Size

366.8 kB

After Optimization

255.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Running-challenges.co.uk main page is 366.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 352.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 12.5 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 101.1 kB

  • Original 352.1 kB
  • After minification 250.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Running Challenges needs image optimization as it can save up to 101.1 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Running Challenges. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

running-challenges.co.uk accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

running-challenges.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

running-challenges.co.uk SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Running-challenges.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Running-challenges.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Running Challenges. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: