Tools & Wizards About Us
rutogo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rutogo.com

ixigo cabs - book local & outstation taxi in India, lowest rental cab services

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

669 ms

rutogo.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rutogo.com now to see the best up-to-date Rutogo content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rutogo.com

ixigo Cabs- Search and compare ola, uber, taxiforsure cabs. Book one-way outstation cabs, taxi online with ixigo cabs app. Hire cheapest cab or taxi from your city. We provide best cab services with v...

Visit rutogo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rutogo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rutogo.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,710 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cabs

1285 ms

client:platform.js

116 ms

css

110 ms

ui.home.v3.style.css

105 ms

conversion.js

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rutogo.com, 9% (11 requests) were made to S.c.appier.net and 6% (7 requests) were made to Ixigo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Edge.ixigo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (45%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rutogo.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 88.0 kB

  • Original 109.4 kB
  • After minification 96.3 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 95.3 kB

  • Original 856.7 kB
  • After minification 761.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rutogo needs image optimization as it can save up to 95.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 645.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 433.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 645.5 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 197.5 kB

  • Original 243.2 kB
  • After minification 243.0 kB
  • After compression 45.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rutogo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 197.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (56%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rutogo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cabs

cabs

1285 ms

client:platform.js

client:platform.js

116 ms

css

css

110 ms

ui.home.v3.style.css

ui.home.v3.style.css

105 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

101 ms

include.js

include.js

355 ms

jquery.all.min.js

jquery.all.min.js

90 ms

ixigo_js_labels_en.js

ixigo_js_labels_en.js

83 ms

ui.homePage.js

ui.homePage.js

104 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

73 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

99 ms

cabs_web_cover.png

cabs_web_cover.png

1840 ms

sticky_footer_ezqwwf.gif

sticky_footer_ezqwwf.gif

356 ms

ixigo_logo_white-02.png

ixigo_logo_white-02.png

58 ms

img_loading.gif

img_loading.gif

56 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

56 ms

ios-store-icon.png

ios-store-icon.png

162 ms

google-play-icon.png

google-play-icon.png

162 ms

cab_home_1.png

cab_home_1.png

972 ms

cab_home_2.png

cab_home_2.png

983 ms

cab_home_3.png

cab_home_3.png

964 ms

cab_home_4.png

cab_home_4.png

1087 ms

approx-total.png

approx-total.png

1508 ms

rupee-arrow.png

rupee-arrow.png

1194 ms

rupee-symbol-back.png

rupee-symbol-back.png

1202 ms

one-way.png

one-way.png

1453 ms

comparison.png

comparison.png

1983 ms

scale.png

scale.png

1425 ms

briefcase.png

briefcase.png

1433 ms

call-driver.png

call-driver.png

2094 ms

packages.png

packages.png

1454 ms

short-trips.png

short-trips.png

1461 ms

chrome_frame.png

chrome_frame.png

1461 ms

abbys_grey.png

abbys_grey.png

1463 ms

dmai_grey.png

dmai_grey.png

1464 ms

idmai_gray.png

idmai_gray.png

1467 ms

mobbys_grey.png

mobbys_grey.png

1468 ms

watt_grey.png

watt_grey.png

1472 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

341 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

378 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

443 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

432 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

370 ms

hotjar-25009.js

hotjar-25009.js

398 ms

appier-track-v1.7.js

appier-track-v1.7.js

323 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

710 ms

ixigo-sprite.woff

ixigo-sprite.woff

1159 ms

content

content

856 ms

content

content

866 ms

client:platform.js

client:platform.js

195 ms

all.js

all.js

464 ms

content

content

858 ms

beacon.js

beacon.js

255 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

569 ms

bat.js

bat.js

318 ms

tagr_lib_learn_in_v3.js

tagr_lib_learn_in_v3.js

246 ms

webengage-min-v-5.0.js

webengage-min-v-5.0.js

231 ms

branch-v1.8.3.min.js

branch-v1.8.3.min.js

202 ms

dc.js

dc.js

222 ms

215 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

109 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

72 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

72 ms

learn

learn

1023 ms

track.js

track.js

21 ms

iframe

iframe

47 ms

19V-

19V-

833 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

62 ms

ocm

ocm

845 ms

sync

sync

1087 ms

sync

sync

1079 ms

rbcm

rbcm

1009 ms

_r

_r

332 ms

60 ms

tr

tr

130 ms

rdr

rdr

851 ms

ocm

ocm

849 ms

bscm

bscm

1027 ms

acm

acm

1036 ms

akcm

akcm

1036 ms

ge

ge

1048 ms

pubmatic

pubmatic

1048 ms

storage-frame-1.10.htm

storage-frame-1.10.htm

134 ms

1233565733-idpiframe.js

1233565733-idpiframe.js

78 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

67 ms

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

92 ms

68 ms

197 ms

233 ms

iframerpc

iframerpc

162 ms

v4.js

v4.js

245 ms

172 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

395 ms

104 ms

open

open

521 ms

upf.js

upf.js

35 ms

ga-callbacks-helper.js

ga-callbacks-helper.js

49 ms

l3.jpg

l3.jpg

50 ms

feedback-widget-close.png

feedback-widget-close.png

22 ms

~1gnmgfh.png

~1gnmgfh.png

906 ms

feedback-tab-bg-dark.png

feedback-tab-bg-dark.png

36 ms

visit-data

visit-data

234 ms

adcm

adcm

894 ms

pixel

pixel

44 ms

cm

cm

867 ms

pixel

pixel

36 ms

gcm

gcm

546 ms

gcm2

gcm2

712 ms

imcm

imcm

828 ms

sd

sd

18 ms

sd

sd

24 ms

sync

sync

78 ms

sync

sync

1127 ms

cs

cs

732 ms

Pug

Pug

72 ms

tap.php

tap.php

44 ms

mbacm

mbacm

665 ms

mbacm

mbacm

688 ms

sync

sync

69 ms

19V-

19V-

555 ms

pixel

pixel

12 ms

gcm

gcm

532 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

83 ms

Accessibility Review

rutogo.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rutogo.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rutogo.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rutogo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rutogo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rutogo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rutogo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: