Tools & Wizards About Us
rwc.bz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

rwc.bz

RWC Tech Solutions – your access point to technology

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

107 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

601 ms

rwc.bz screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RWC content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rwc.bz

Visit rwc.bz

Key Findings

We analyzed Rwc.bz page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rwc.bz performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,260 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.044

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rwc.bz

107 ms

www.rwctechsolutions.com

285 ms

style.min.css

56 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

54 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rwc.bz, 47% (47 requests) were made to Rwctechsolutions.com and 22% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (57%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rwc.bz main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 70.2 kB

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 81.4 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 300.4 kB
  • After minification 289.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RWC images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 368.7 kB

  • Original 933.0 kB
  • After minification 881.5 kB
  • After compression 564.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 368.7 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 885.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 774.6 kB
  • After compression 140.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rwc.bz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 885.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (91%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RWC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rwc.bz

rwc.bz

107 ms

www.rwctechsolutions.com

www.rwctechsolutions.com

285 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

56 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

54 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

62 ms

styles.css

styles.css

54 ms

bootstrap-min.css

bootstrap-min.css

122 ms

bootstrap-rtl-min.css

bootstrap-rtl-min.css

128 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

99 ms

fontawesome-all.css

fontawesome-all.css

95 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

69 ms

slick.css

slick.css

74 ms

unitest.css

unitest.css

83 ms

iconfont.css

iconfont.css

90 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

100 ms

owl.css

owl.css

108 ms

theme.css

theme.css

137 ms

custom-widgets.css

custom-widgets.css

132 ms

stellarnav-min.css

stellarnav-min.css

111 ms

style.css

style.css

131 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

140 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

149 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

140 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

141 ms

global.css

global.css

146 ms

post-3024.css

post-3024.css

153 ms

css

css

75 ms

css

css

98 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

63 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

58 ms

js

js

98 ms

image-cdn.js

image-cdn.js

184 ms

index.js

index.js

184 ms

index.js

index.js

203 ms

count-to.js

count-to.js

204 ms

jquery-appear.js

jquery-appear.js

204 ms

isotop-min.js

isotop-min.js

204 ms

owl.js

owl.js

208 ms

popper-min.js

popper-min.js

207 ms

bootstrap-min.js

bootstrap-min.js

207 ms

jquery-magnific-popup-min.js

jquery-magnific-popup-min.js

207 ms

stellarnav-min.js

stellarnav-min.js

208 ms

slick-min.js

slick-min.js

208 ms

theme.js

theme.js

216 ms

api.js

api.js

122 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

53 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

53 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

56 ms

e-202440.js

e-202440.js

57 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

55 ms

mobile-menu.js

mobile-menu.js

209 ms

index.js

index.js

252 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

238 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

233 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

225 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

217 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

210 ms

RWCTechSolutions-WhiteRed-noicon.png

RWCTechSolutions-WhiteRed-noicon.png

2762 ms

default

default

182 ms

home-banner.jpg

home-banner.jpg

304 ms

about-4sh.png

about-4sh.png

491 ms

tesimg.jpg

tesimg.jpg

304 ms

about-logo.png

about-logo.png

180 ms

about-shape.png

about-shape.png

181 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uz.woff

90 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uz.woff

104 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uz.woff

174 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uz.woff

176 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uz.woff

174 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uz.woff

174 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uz.woff

175 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

67 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

59 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

67 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3iQ.woff

173 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff

174 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTQ3iQ.woff

177 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3iQ.woff

175 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDIkhdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDIkhdTQ3iQ.woff

175 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff

177 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3iQ.woff

177 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTQ3iQ.woff

176 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

110 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tdE3U3f4Q.woff

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tdE3U3f4Q.woff

177 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tvE3U3f4Q.woff

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tvE3U3f4Q.woff

178 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8sDE3U3f4Q.woff

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8sDE3U3f4Q.woff

178 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8uDFHU3f4Q.woff

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8uDFHU3f4Q.woff

177 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8u6FHU3f4Q.woff

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8u6FHU3f4Q.woff

208 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8vdFHU3f4Q.woff

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8vdFHU3f4Q.woff

177 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8v0FHU3f4Q.woff

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8v0FHU3f4Q.woff

178 ms

bootstrap-icons.woff

bootstrap-icons.woff

63 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

119 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

64 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

26 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

35 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

28 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

40 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

39 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

38 ms

Accessibility Review

rwc.bz accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rwc.bz best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rwc.bz SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rwc.bz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rwc.bz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rwc.bz

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RWC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: