Tools & Wizards About Us
safetylit.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

safetylit.org

SafetyLit: Injury Research and Prevention Literature Update

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

176 ms

Resources Loaded

771 ms

Page Rendered

97 ms

safetylit.org screenshot

About Website

Visit safetylit.org now to see the best up-to-date Safety Lit content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about safetylit.org

Weekly updates of injury research and prevention literature and a searchable archive of items published beginning in the mid-17th century.

Visit safetylit.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Safetylit.org page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 868 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

safetylit.org performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

safetylit.org

176 ms

www.safetylit.org

273 ms

safetylit_new.css

61 ms

jquery.js

124 ms

menu.js

183 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Safetylit.org, 11% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (273 ms) belongs to the original domain Safetylit.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.2 kB (38%)

Content Size

105.3 kB

After Optimization

65.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Safetylit.org main page is 105.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 42.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 22.1 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 18.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Safety Lit needs image optimization as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 56% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 140 B

  • Original 37.4 kB
  • After minification 37.4 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 342 B

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safetylit.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safety Lit. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

safetylit.org

safetylit.org

176 ms

www.safetylit.org

www.safetylit.org

273 ms

safetylit_new.css

safetylit_new.css

61 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

124 ms

menu.js

menu.js

183 ms

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

18 ms

circles.png

circles.png

65 ms

book.png

book.png

158 ms

feed.png

feed.png

113 ms

GuideStar-P-80.png

GuideStar-P-80.png

120 ms

SeeScan.png

SeeScan.png

174 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

19 ms

ga.js

ga.js

17 ms

top_strip_repeater.png

top_strip_repeater.png

116 ms

logo.png

logo.png

122 ms

search.png

search.png

127 ms

button-repet.png

button-repet.png

127 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

collect

collect

24 ms

Accessibility Review

safetylit.org accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

safetylit.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

safetylit.org SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safetylit.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Safetylit.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

safetylit.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Safety Lit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: