17.1 sec in total
3 sec
13.5 sec
602 ms
Click here to check amazing Santiagoaeropuerto content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about santiagoaeropuerto.com
Ene 16, 2023 | Editar Transavia: “Invierno es la oportunidad perfecta para visitar Santiago” Leer más Ene 11, 2023 | Editar Santiago rompe sus marcas en 2022 y fija objetivos para 2023 Leer más Oct 26...
Visit santiagoaeropuerto.comWe analyzed Santiagoaeropuerto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 14.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
santiagoaeropuerto.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value27.5 s
0/100
25%
Value32.7 s
0/100
10%
Value990 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.11
87/100
15%
Value27.7 s
0/100
10%
2966 ms
7833 ms
224 ms
732 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Santiagoaeropuerto.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Santiagoaeropuerto.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (53%)
2.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Santiagoaeropuerto.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 278.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 278.0 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 309 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Santiagoaeropuerto images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 430.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 430.4 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 822.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Santiagoaeropuerto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 822.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (81%)
89
17
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Santiagoaeropuerto. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
santiagoaeropuerto.com
2966 ms
santiagoaeropuerto.com
7833 ms
premiumkits.css
224 ms
style.css
732 ms
theme.css
333 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
332 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
337 ms
dashicons.min.css
693 ms
public-premiumkits-author-box.css
359 ms
public-premiumkits-basic-elements.css
552 ms
public-premiumkits-coming-soon.css
442 ms
public-premiumkits-content-formatting.css
448 ms
public-premiumkits-contributors.css
481 ms
public-premiumkits-facebook.css
555 ms
public-premiumkits-featured-categories.css
560 ms
public-premiumkits-inline-posts.css
606 ms
public-premiumkits-instagram.css
664 ms
public-premiumkits-justified-gallery.css
670 ms
public-premiumkits-lazyload.css
673 ms
glightbox.min.css
733 ms
public-premiumkits-lightbox.css
777 ms
public-premiumkits-opt-in-forms.css
784 ms
advanced-popups-public.css
787 ms
public-premiumkits-widget-posts.css
811 ms
public-premiumkits-share-buttons.css
942 ms
public-premiumkits-slider-gallery.css
852 ms
public-premiumkits-social-links.css
1322 ms
public-premiumkits-table-of-contents.css
898 ms
public-premiumkits-twitter.css
900 ms
public-premiumkits-widget-about.css
930 ms
wp-ulike.min.css
1091 ms
07b0f6b3f0a3391d7b23995896d3adba.css
1117 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
1012 ms
style.css
1394 ms
masterslider.main.css
1154 ms
custom.css
1126 ms
jetpack.css
1564 ms
sdk.js
25 ms
w.js
20 ms
e-202433.js
21 ms
jquery.min.js
1549 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1022 ms
advanced-popups-public.js
937 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1030 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1044 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1081 ms
index.min.js
1032 ms
index.min.js
1044 ms
i18n-loader.js
1039 ms
public-premiumkits-basic-elements.js
1066 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
1080 ms
public-premiumkits-justified-gallery.js
1056 ms
lazysizes.config.js
1017 ms
lazysizes.min.js
1013 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1035 ms
glightbox.min.js
1334 ms
public-premiumkits-lightbox.js
982 ms
public-premiumkits-opt-in-forms.js
1193 ms
public-premiumkits-share-buttons.js
1148 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
1245 ms
public-premiumkits-slider-gallery.js
1242 ms
public-premiumkits-table-of-contents.js
1218 ms
wp-ulike.min.js
1177 ms
index.min.js
1131 ms
jp-search.js
1144 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
1254 ms
headroom.min.js
1101 ms
script.js
1030 ms
responsive-videos.js
952 ms
hjffsj-768x768.jpg
1067 ms
EC-JZS_CRJ900_Air_Nostrum_SCQ-768x512.jpg
1134 ms
Fondo-MAD-SCQ-A321-768x720.jpg
1234 ms
1280px-D-AEWN_A320_Eurowings_ARN-768x768.jpg
945 ms
-SNEG6wjDDw
128 ms
PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA
3 ms
sdk.js
19 ms
318 ms
cropped-blantitular-1.png
474 ms
hjffsj.jpg
796 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
23 ms
base.js
46 ms
ad_status.js
138 ms
RAiHx6Z8aI87xfn3BcPOACt6MzvCMtPfFa8gMAvLcEc.js
113 ms
embed.js
39 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
48 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
129 ms
EC-JZS_CRJ900_Air_Nostrum_SCQ-1024x682.jpg
369 ms
id
36 ms
Create
95 ms
g.gif
93 ms
GenerateIT
32 ms
g.gif
2 ms
premiumkits-icons.woff
221 ms
santiagoaeropuerto.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
santiagoaeropuerto.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
santiagoaeropuerto.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Santiagoaeropuerto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Santiagoaeropuerto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
santiagoaeropuerto.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Santiagoaeropuerto. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: