Tools & Wizards About Us
saraltyping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

saraltyping.com

RHC Typing | RHC Typing test | RHC Typing exam | RHC typing software | CPCT typing | DSSSB typing | DSSSB Typing | DSSSB Typing test | DSSSB Typing ex...

Page Load Speed

16.5 sec in total

First Response

324 ms

Resources Loaded

15.3 sec

Page Rendered

851 ms

saraltyping.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to saraltyping.com homepage info - get ready to check Saral Typing best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about saraltyping.com

RHC Typing Software | RHC Junior Clerk typing test | DSSSB typing exam | DSSSB typing test | DSSSB typing hindi | BELTRON DEO Typing Test Software | | Typing Test and Efficiency Test Software for Raja...

Visit saraltyping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Saraltyping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 16.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

saraltyping.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

saraltyping.com

324 ms

css

34 ms

style.min.css

100 ms

public-main.css

111 ms

all.min.css

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Saraltyping.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (345 ms) belongs to the original domain Saraltyping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 640.6 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Saraltyping.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 962.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 132.2 kB

  • Original 163.1 kB
  • After minification 161.8 kB
  • After compression 30.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 102.9 kB

  • Original 962.6 kB
  • After minification 859.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Saral Typing needs image optimization as it can save up to 102.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 243.8 kB

  • Original 579.8 kB
  • After minification 579.6 kB
  • After compression 336.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.8 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 161.7 kB

  • Original 193.1 kB
  • After minification 192.8 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saraltyping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 161.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (43%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Saral Typing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

saraltyping.com

saraltyping.com

324 ms

css

css

34 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

100 ms

public-main.css

public-main.css

111 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

135 ms

font-icons.min.css

font-icons.min.css

97 ms

columns.min.css

columns.min.css

95 ms

navigation-branding.min.css

navigation-branding.min.css

105 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

148 ms

public-main.js

public-main.js

114 ms

js

js

73 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

336 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

345 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

145 ms

w-indicator-stripe.min.js

w-indicator-stripe.min.js

131 ms

w-autoplay.min.js

w-autoplay.min.js

142 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

335 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

65 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

314 ms

dropdown-click.min.js

dropdown-click.min.js

315 ms

back-to-top.min.js

back-to-top.min.js

315 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

314 ms

new-menu-gif.gif

new-menu-gif.gif

179 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

180 ms

twitterhover.png

twitterhover.png

180 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

181 ms

facebookhover.png

facebookhover.png

181 ms

youtube1.png

youtube1.png

180 ms

youtubehover1.png

youtubehover1.png

181 ms

Screenshot-2024-07-26-220927.png

Screenshot-2024-07-26-220927.png

181 ms

Exam2.png

Exam2.png

182 ms

examsnglln.png

examsnglln.png

183 ms

tutorfreemind.png

tutorfreemind.png

184 ms

Exam1.png

Exam1.png

184 ms

tutormainscrn.png

tutormainscrn.png

182 ms

Important-Announcement-By-Megaphone-Customers-1-Made-with-PosterMyWall-1-1.jpg

Important-Announcement-By-Megaphone-Customers-1-Made-with-PosterMyWall-1-1.jpg

183 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

121 ms

esDR31xSG-6AGleN2tWklg.woff

esDR31xSG-6AGleN2tWklg.woff

79 ms

esDT31xSG-6AGleN2tCUkp8F.woff

esDT31xSG-6AGleN2tCUkp8F.woff

108 ms

generatepress.woff

generatepress.woff

78 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

124 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

123 ms

saral_typing.png

saral_typing.png

62 ms

ezgif.com-gif-maker-1.gif

ezgif.com-gif-maker-1.gif

153 ms

Hindityping1.png

Hindityping1.png

102 ms

tutormainscrn-1024x542.png

tutormainscrn-1024x542.png

62 ms

Exam1-1024x541.png

Exam1-1024x541.png

171 ms

hinditypinglearn.png

hinditypinglearn.png

78 ms

cc-dc.png

cc-dc.png

100 ms

net-banking.png

net-banking.png

99 ms

wallets.png

wallets.png

100 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

96 ms

ads

ads

92 ms

ads

ads

62 ms

Accessibility Review

saraltyping.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

saraltyping.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

saraltyping.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Saraltyping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Saraltyping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

saraltyping.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Saral Typing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: