4.8 sec in total
132 ms
3.9 sec
779 ms
Visit saveclayton.org now to see the best up-to-date Save Clayton content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about saveclayton.org
SaveClayton.org is a group of concerned Clayton citizens who help to preseve, maintain and enhance the small town atmosphere. Sign Up!
Visit saveclayton.orgWe analyzed Saveclayton.org page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
saveclayton.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value6.7 s
35/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.215
58/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
132 ms
2266 ms
64 ms
102 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Saveclayton.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Saveclayton.org.
Page size can be reduced by 228.5 kB (15%)
1.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Saveclayton.org main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 729.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Save Clayton images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.0 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saveclayton.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (82%)
73
13
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Save Clayton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
saveclayton.org
132 ms
saveclayton.org
2266 ms
js
64 ms
thegem-preloader.css
102 ms
thegem-reset.css
154 ms
thegem-grid.css
155 ms
thegem-header.css
207 ms
style.css
214 ms
style.css
159 ms
thegem-widgets.css
230 ms
thegem-new-css.css
221 ms
thegem-perevazka-css.css
212 ms
css
33 ms
custom-GfETY7Ir.css
222 ms
js_composer.min.css
318 ms
thegem-js_composer_columns.css
260 ms
thegem-additional-blog-1.css
261 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
261 ms
thegem-vc_elements.css
270 ms
style.min.css
276 ms
styles.css
311 ms
jquery.min.js
315 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
347 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
350 ms
zilla-likes.js
350 ms
icons-elegant.css
355 ms
animate.min.css
355 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
357 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
355 ms
thegem-blog.css
356 ms
thegem-additional-blog.css
357 ms
thegem-itemsAnimations.css
541 ms
thegem-form-elements.js
541 ms
jquery.easing.js
541 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
542 ms
thegem-menu_init.js
541 ms
thegem-header.js
542 ms
functions.js
543 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
544 ms
api.js
55 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
543 ms
scc-c2.min.js
7 ms
jquery.fancybox-init.js
489 ms
index.js
437 ms
index.js
437 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
434 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
382 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
373 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
370 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
371 ms
index.js
358 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
411 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
388 ms
skrollr.min.js
388 ms
thegem-scrollMonitor.js
386 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
378 ms
jquery.carouFredSel.js
368 ms
thegem-gallery.js
412 ms
thegem-itemsAnimations.js
409 ms
thegem-blog-core.js
375 ms
thegem-blog.js
375 ms
gtm.js
232 ms
isotope.min.js
371 ms
logo_c7386a8884b7c03ae1e21b227ffe9c29_1x.png
327 ms
J-P-P.jpg
690 ms
east-bay-city-size-2.png
327 ms
east-bay-city-density.png
498 ms
mt-diablo-eagle-peak-2-1024x682.jpg
687 ms
Enough-2-thegem-blog-justified.jpg
496 ms
cloven-demonstration-121920-thegem-blog-justified.jpg
144 ms
catalano-sell-out.jpg
459 ms
pinocchio-thegem-blog-justified.jpeg
312 ms
post-arrow.svg
458 ms
font
494 ms
thegem-icons.woff
492 ms
thegem-socials.woff
452 ms
font
494 ms
montserrat-ultralight.woff
338 ms
recaptcha__en.js
308 ms
saveclayton.org
447 ms
saveclayton.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
saveclayton.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
saveclayton.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Saveclayton.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Saveclayton.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
saveclayton.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Save Clayton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: