Tools & Wizards About Us
scargill.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

scargill.net

Scargill

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

508 ms

scargill.net screenshot

About Website

Visit scargill.net now to see the best up-to-date Scargill content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scargill.net

Peter and Maureen Scargill\'s blog and website

Visit scargill.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Scargill.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scargill.net performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.scargill.net

1177 ms

script.js

174 ms

style.css

176 ms

styles.css

196 ms

fancybox.css

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Scargill.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Scargill.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 245.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

780.1 kB

After Optimization

535.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scargill.net main page is 780.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 484.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 45.9 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 46.2 kB

  • Original 484.2 kB
  • After minification 438.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scargill images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 130.0 kB

  • Original 211.6 kB
  • After minification 206.8 kB
  • After compression 81.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 130.0 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 31.8 kB

  • Original 37.3 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scargill.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (52%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scargill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.scargill.net

www.scargill.net

1177 ms

script.js

script.js

174 ms

style.css

style.css

176 ms

styles.css

styles.css

196 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

197 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

296 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

227 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

354 ms

gdbc-public.js

gdbc-public.js

358 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

352 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

399 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

412 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

282 ms

www.scargill.net

www.scargill.net

651 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

42 ms

Page-BgSimpleGradient.jpg

Page-BgSimpleGradient.jpg

260 ms

Page-BgGlare.png

Page-BgGlare.png

270 ms

Sheet-s.png

Sheet-s.png

260 ms

Sheet-h.png

Sheet-h.png

261 ms

Sheet-v.png

Sheet-v.png

281 ms

Header.png

Header.png

539 ms

Header.jpg

Header.jpg

453 ms

nav.png

nav.png

395 ms

MenuItem.png

MenuItem.png

452 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

451 ms

subitem-bg.png

subitem-bg.png

574 ms

BlockHeader.png

BlockHeader.png

619 ms

BlockHeaderIcon.png

BlockHeaderIcon.png

622 ms

BlockContent-s.png

BlockContent-s.png

636 ms

BlockContent-h.png

BlockContent-h.png

713 ms

BlockContent-v.png

BlockContent-v.png

749 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

794 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

801 ms

google.png

google.png

802 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

809 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

889 ms

BlockContentBullets.png

BlockContentBullets.png

935 ms

Button.png

Button.png

967 ms

PostHeaderIcon.png

PostHeaderIcon.png

981 ms

Sunrise_thumb.jpg

Sunrise_thumb.jpg

1069 ms

sPAIN_thumb.jpg

sPAIN_thumb.jpg

1241 ms

Spain_thumb.jpg

Spain_thumb.jpg

1152 ms

Spain6_thumb.jpg

Spain6_thumb.jpg

1355 ms

Kitty_thumb.jpg

Kitty_thumb.jpg

1328 ms

tmpE97E_thumb-1.jpg

tmpE97E_thumb-1.jpg

1252 ms

rssIcon.png

rssIcon.png

1248 ms

Footer.png

Footer.png

1313 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

MenuSeparator.png

MenuSeparator.png

1365 ms

Accessibility Review

scargill.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

scargill.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

scargill.net SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scargill.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scargill.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scargill.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scargill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: