Tools & Wizards About Us
scottsdalecamelback.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

scottsdalecamelback.com

Resort | Scottsdale Camelback Resort | United States

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

53 ms

scottsdalecamelback.com screenshot

About Website

Visit scottsdalecamelback.com now to see the best up-to-date Scottsdale Camelback content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scottsdalecamelback.com

When you’re ready to escape, unwind, and relax, Scottsdale Camelback Resort offers everything you need. Located at the base of Camelback Mountain in Scottsdale, Arizona, Scottsdale Camelback Resort pr...

Visit scottsdalecamelback.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Scottsdalecamelback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scottsdalecamelback.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,420 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.scottsdalecamelback.com

199 ms

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

61 ms

sjrn_autocx.js

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Scottsdalecamelback.com, 34% (18 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (16 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (672 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 550.5 kB (55%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

457.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Scottsdalecamelback.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 628.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 498.8 kB

  • Original 628.0 kB
  • After minification 626.1 kB
  • After compression 129.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 498.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 77.2 kB
  • After minification 73.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scottsdale Camelback images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.4 kB

  • Original 302.9 kB
  • After minification 302.9 kB
  • After compression 254.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (37%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scottsdale Camelback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.scottsdalecamelback.com

www.scottsdalecamelback.com

199 ms

minified.js

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

61 ms

sjrn_autocx.js

sjrn_autocx.js

74 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

60 ms

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

60 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

23 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

61 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

60 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

61 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

58 ms

206.html

206.html

74 ms

SC%20color_edited.png

SC%20color_edited.png

342 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

55 ms

Experience%20Scottsdale_edited.png

Experience%20Scottsdale_edited.png

157 ms

splashCMYK.png

splashCMYK.png

168 ms

RWS%20Circle%20Logo.png

RWS%20Circle%20Logo.png

293 ms

Old%20Town%20Circle%20Logo%20(1).png

Old%20Town%20Circle%20Logo%20(1).png

226 ms

Vacatia%20V%20logo.png

Vacatia%20V%20logo.png

235 ms

7a99b6_9cf7552c26e54eccac511bc252ed36aa~mv2.jpg

7a99b6_9cf7552c26e54eccac511bc252ed36aa~mv2.jpg

358 ms

7a99b6_f99d6ec740864a019bd44f2d26b990d6~mv2.jpg

7a99b6_f99d6ec740864a019bd44f2d26b990d6~mv2.jpg

413 ms

7a99b6_c68213f0c3844d27b04ef9a442c6127e~mv2_d_3840_2160_s_2.jpg

7a99b6_c68213f0c3844d27b04ef9a442c6127e~mv2_d_3840_2160_s_2.jpg

491 ms

7a99b6_42c0f62e190c493cb71afd92028addfb~mv2.jpg

7a99b6_42c0f62e190c493cb71afd92028addfb~mv2.jpg

454 ms

woman-massage_XVEZDYZASS.jpg

woman-massage_XVEZDYZASS.jpg

442 ms

IMG_5586.jpg

IMG_5586.jpg

482 ms

7a99b6_c75072b2d034455996e29344261519a3~mv2.jpg

7a99b6_c75072b2d034455996e29344261519a3~mv2.jpg

646 ms

Exterior%20looking%20at%20Mini%20Golf.jpg

Exterior%20looking%20at%20Mini%20Golf.jpg

650 ms

7a99b6_fb3296b959d44ce0aef1f7e5f81d4faa~mv2.jpg

7a99b6_fb3296b959d44ce0aef1f7e5f81d4faa~mv2.jpg

672 ms

Vacatia_copy_Logo_edited_edited.png

Vacatia_copy_Logo_edited_edited.png

586 ms

hasher.js

hasher.js

5 ms

create_params.js

create_params.js

64 ms

104 ms

101 ms

100 ms

97 ms

94 ms

95 ms

125 ms

123 ms

123 ms

123 ms

118 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

5 ms

cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff

cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff

5 ms

FuturaLTW05-LightCondensed.woff

FuturaLTW05-LightCondensed.woff

10 ms

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

10 ms

AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff

AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff

4 ms

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

10 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

5 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

4 ms

Accessibility Review

scottsdalecamelback.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

scottsdalecamelback.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

scottsdalecamelback.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scottsdalecamelback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scottsdalecamelback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scottsdalecamelback.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scottsdale Camelback. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: