Tools & Wizards About Us
screeninghive.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

screeninghive.com

Free Video Interviewing Software Platform for Recruiters & HRs

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

291 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

752 ms

screeninghive.com screenshot

About Website

Visit screeninghive.com now to see the best up-to-date Screeninghive content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about screeninghive.com

ScreeningHive video interviewing software helps recruiters to enhance the candidates experience & hire the best candidates.

Visit screeninghive.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screeninghive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screeninghive.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.22

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screeninghive.com

291 ms

css

39 ms

css

53 ms

line-awesome-font-awesome.min.css

158 ms

bootstrap.min.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Screeninghive.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.icons8.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (408 ms) belongs to the original domain Screeninghive.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screeninghive.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 68.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screeninghive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 97 B

  • Original 63.4 kB
  • After minification 63.4 kB
  • After compression 63.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 927 B

  • Original 26.2 kB
  • After minification 26.2 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screeninghive.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (28%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screeninghive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screeninghive.com

screeninghive.com

291 ms

css

css

39 ms

css

css

53 ms

line-awesome-font-awesome.min.css

line-awesome-font-awesome.min.css

158 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

56 ms

testimonial.css

testimonial.css

66 ms

style.css

style.css

74 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

254 ms

js

js

95 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

21 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

370 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

76 ms

custom.js

custom.js

122 ms

js

js

115 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

165 ms

logo.png

logo.png

216 ms

header-banner-new.png

header-banner-new.png

296 ms

home-laptop.png

home-laptop.png

155 ms

text-back-1.png

text-back-1.png

81 ms

createtemplate.png

createtemplate.png

84 ms

create-interview.png

create-interview.png

179 ms

text-back-2.png

text-back-2.png

295 ms

text-back-3.png

text-back-3.png

180 ms

email-invite.png

email-invite.png

212 ms

interview-landing.png

interview-landing.png

212 ms

text-back-4.png

text-back-4.png

210 ms

interview-started.png

interview-started.png

257 ms

feedback.png

feedback.png

257 ms

interviews.png

interviews.png

258 ms

features-bg.png

features-bg.png

381 ms

icon-5.png

icon-5.png

288 ms

icon-2.png

icon-2.png

287 ms

icon-3.png

icon-3.png

288 ms

icon-4.png

icon-4.png

288 ms

icon-1.png

icon-1.png

289 ms

icon-6.png

icon-6.png

290 ms

save-time.svg

save-time.svg

295 ms

interview-experience.jpg

interview-experience.jpg

293 ms

face-lie.jpg

face-lie.jpg

292 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

408 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

137 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

138 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

173 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

180 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

184 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

182 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

182 ms

line-awesome.svg

line-awesome.svg

102 ms

line-awesome.woff

line-awesome.woff

132 ms

collect

collect

73 ms

collect

collect

53 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

39 ms

Accessibility Review

screeninghive.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

screeninghive.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

screeninghive.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screeninghive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screeninghive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screeninghive.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screeninghive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: