Tools & Wizards About Us
screenmend.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

screenmend.com

ScreenForce - Simply Screen Repair

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

screenmend.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Screen Mend content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenmend.com

The simplest way to order your next pool, window and door Screen Repair. Upfront pricing, instant scheduling, highest quality.

Visit screenmend.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenmend.com page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenmend.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

screenmend.com

111 ms

www.screenmend.com

54 ms

bt

165 ms

require.min.js

92 ms

main-r.min.js

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Screenmend.com, 48% (35 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 14% (10 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (568 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (73%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

980.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenmend.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 82.2 kB
  • After minification 81.9 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 39.7 kB

  • Original 240.2 kB
  • After minification 200.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screen Mend needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 2.2 MB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB
  • After compression 715.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.2 MB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 246.7 kB

  • Original 296.7 kB
  • After minification 293.6 kB
  • After compression 50.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenmend.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 246.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (77%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screen Mend. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenmend.com

screenmend.com

111 ms

www.screenmend.com

www.screenmend.com

54 ms

bt

bt

165 ms

require.min.js

require.min.js

92 ms

main-r.min.js

main-r.min.js

95 ms

viewer.css

viewer.css

119 ms

dynamicmodel

dynamicmodel

12 ms

212845_ffe3d0715c8d3b090af06c3debbd7998_14.json.z

212845_ffe3d0715c8d3b090af06c3debbd7998_14.json.z

333 ms

212845_3ae09c7dc1e056bfa52e091372f2aaa9_14.json.z

212845_3ae09c7dc1e056bfa52e091372f2aaa9_14.json.z

568 ms

ugc-viewer

ugc-viewer

211 ms

ugc-viewer

ugc-viewer

211 ms

bt

bt

210 ms

skins.min.js

skins.min.js

92 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

46 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

88 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

205 ms

react-with-addons.min.js

react-with-addons.min.js

203 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

200 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

291 ms

layout.min.js

layout.min.js

289 ms

tpa.min.js

tpa.min.js

289 ms

fonts.min.js

fonts.min.js

285 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

285 ms

swfobject.min.js

swfobject.min.js

283 ms

mousetrap.min.js

mousetrap.min.js

285 ms

tweenEngine.min.js

tweenEngine.min.js

277 ms

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

277 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

278 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

278 ms

widgets.min.js

widgets.min.js

276 ms

experiment.js

experiment.js

276 ms

render.min.js

render.min.js

277 ms

wixappsCore.min.js

wixappsCore.min.js

282 ms

wixappsClassics.min.js

wixappsClassics.min.js

281 ms

wixappsBuilder.min.js

wixappsBuilder.min.js

279 ms

zepto.min.js

zepto.min.js

271 ms

color.min.js

color.min.js

270 ms

react-dom-server.min.js

react-dom-server.min.js

229 ms

bt

bt

173 ms

bt

bt

407 ms

dc.js

dc.js

347 ms

044e70_94be0aedf7d047edb8c67d42eebdca51.png

044e70_94be0aedf7d047edb8c67d42eebdca51.png

260 ms

fade_line.png

fade_line.png

132 ms

css

css

130 ms

latin.css

latin.css

125 ms

044e70_13f64142cca941f987220682ffa7c528.jpg

044e70_13f64142cca941f987220682ffa7c528.jpg

253 ms

044e70_e494865de6ef4a599a438ae9384b5dad.jpg

044e70_e494865de6ef4a599a438ae9384b5dad.jpg

557 ms

044e70_42849145b0a94b6cb3a5eae20a4151b5.png

044e70_42849145b0a94b6cb3a5eae20a4151b5.png

345 ms

044e70_871816cd875f458db152f51ada4ecec3.png

044e70_871816cd875f458db152f51ada4ecec3.png

342 ms

044e70_f0e0f1edf9d049298432395580ea6d3c.jpg

044e70_f0e0f1edf9d049298432395580ea6d3c.jpg

272 ms

044e70_7f16def567184ae3af194bd20f1690fd.png

044e70_7f16def567184ae3af194bd20f1690fd.png

251 ms

bt

bt

79 ms

bt

bt

79 ms

bt

bt

77 ms

liftedshadow_medium.png

liftedshadow_medium.png

78 ms

2kinLzjAYfI

2kinLzjAYfI

238 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

34 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

41 ms

I27Pb-wEGH2ajLYP0QrtSInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

I27Pb-wEGH2ajLYP0QrtSInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

40 ms

-KTKVm0Mx9ZCRXL9CXVIbaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

-KTKVm0Mx9ZCRXL9CXVIbaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

55 ms

WxzDAY6mC9v3znSJEtCoW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

WxzDAY6mC9v3znSJEtCoW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

170 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

30 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

143 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

178 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

59 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

96 ms

base.js

base.js

148 ms

ugc-viewer

ugc-viewer

86 ms

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

67 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

73 ms

044e70_7f16def567184ae3af194bd20f1690fd.png

044e70_7f16def567184ae3af194bd20f1690fd.png

127 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

42 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

45 ms

SEO Factors

screenmend.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenmend.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Screenmend.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenmend.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screen Mend. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: