1.7 sec in total
284 ms
1.2 sec
163 ms
Welcome to sdimaging.com homepage info - get ready to check Sd Imaging best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about sdimaging.com
Providing Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology services to the San Diego community for over 40 years.
Visit sdimaging.comWe analyzed Sdimaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
sdimaging.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value1,590 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
284 ms
167 ms
174 ms
171 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sdimaging.com, 85% (79 requests) were made to Aaeeb8.p3cdn1.secureserver.net and 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) relates to the external source Aaeeb8.p3cdn1.secureserver.net.
Page size can be reduced by 63.5 kB (5%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Sdimaging.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 563.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sd Imaging images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sdimaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (92%)
79
6
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sd Imaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sdimaging.com
284 ms
style.css
167 ms
flaticon.css
174 ms
style.css
171 ms
style.css
168 ms
style.css
196 ms
flaticon.css
168 ms
styles.css
182 ms
rs6.css
188 ms
style.css
185 ms
woocommerce.css
190 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
193 ms
responsive.css
200 ms
js_composer.css
214 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
205 ms
master.css
202 ms
isotope.css
244 ms
shop.css
240 ms
dynamic-styles.php
57 ms
switcher.css
243 ms
jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
243 ms
jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js
242 ms
rbtools.min.js
245 ms
rs6.min.js
260 ms
modernizr.js
256 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
260 ms
comment-reply.min.js
265 ms
hooks.min.js
260 ms
i18n.min.js
284 ms
index.js
273 ms
index.js
278 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
279 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
286 ms
bootstrap.min.js
286 ms
cssua.min.js
291 ms
waypoints.min.js
295 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
316 ms
api.js
43 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
141 ms
masonry.min.js
147 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
152 ms
ios-orientationchange-fix.js
163 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
155 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
161 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
153 ms
bootstrap-select.js
149 ms
evol.colorpicker.min.js
156 ms
dmss.js
152 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
160 ms
scripts.js
167 ms
css
60 ms
isotope.css
152 ms
validation-2.2.min.css
163 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
124 ms
jquery.nouislider.css
128 ms
flexslider.css
133 ms
prettyPhoto.css
130 ms
main.css
141 ms
yamm.css
159 ms
loader.css
165 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.css
143 ms
bootstrap.css
155 ms
theme-GlobalUI.css
134 ms
theme.css
138 ms
theme-Cosmetic.css
162 ms
custom.css
145 ms
inner.css
144 ms
shop.css
143 ms
blog.css
166 ms
responsive.css
144 ms
animate.css
144 ms
color.css
142 ms
debugging.css
152 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
146 ms
index.js
304 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
296 ms
SDi_logo_290x88.png
59 ms
calendar.png
59 ms
home-new.jpeg
60 ms
decor-brand.png
61 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
44 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
44 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
92 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
96 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
116 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
117 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
116 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
117 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
117 ms
flaticon.woff
182 ms
flaticon.woff
95 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
192 ms
recaptcha__en.js
71 ms
sdimaging.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sdimaging.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sdimaging.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sdimaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sdimaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sdimaging.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sd Imaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: