Tools & Wizards About Us
securepaymentz.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

securepaymentz.com

#1 The Best Banking Software - eWallet Script - Banking Software Script - Ewallet Software

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

862 ms

Page Rendered

581 ms

securepaymentz.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to securepaymentz.com homepage info - get ready to check Securepaymentz best content right away, or after learning these important things about securepaymentz.com

Banking Software, The Best Banking Software, Banking Software, Online Banking Software, Core Banking Software, Online Banking Software, Banking Software Prices, Script Banking - Secure Paymentz

Visit securepaymentz.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Securepaymentz.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

securepaymentz.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

securepaymentz.com

56 ms

css

43 ms

all.min.js

615 ms

tiny-slider.css

16 ms

webfont.css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Securepaymentz.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (615 ms) belongs to the original domain Securepaymentz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (42%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Securepaymentz.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 46.5 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 810.9 kB
  • After minification 787.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Securepaymentz images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 889.7 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 755.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 889.7 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 216.0 kB

  • Original 272.2 kB
  • After minification 215.0 kB
  • After compression 56.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securepaymentz.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (51%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Securepaymentz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

securepaymentz.com

securepaymentz.com

56 ms

css

css

43 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

615 ms

tiny-slider.css

tiny-slider.css

16 ms

webfont.css

webfont.css

16 ms

theme.css

theme.css

28 ms

mdtoast.css

mdtoast.css

40 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

22 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

18 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

553 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

550 ms

tiny-slider.js

tiny-slider.js

567 ms

tinyslider-custom.js

tinyslider-custom.js

551 ms

mdtoast.js

mdtoast.js

48 ms

axios.min.js

axios.min.js

55 ms

demo.js

demo.js

551 ms

css

css

19 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

45 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

78 ms

curve-top.svg

curve-top.svg

475 ms

curve-bottom.svg

curve-bottom.svg

476 ms

site-logo.svg

site-logo.svg

477 ms

product-hero-1.png

product-hero-1.png

506 ms

logo-1.svg

logo-1.svg

478 ms

logo-2.svg

logo-2.svg

480 ms

logo-3.svg

logo-3.svg

480 ms

logo-4.svg

logo-4.svg

482 ms

logo-5.svg

logo-5.svg

501 ms

logo-6.svg

logo-6.svg

485 ms

quote-icon.svg

quote-icon.svg

485 ms

trello.svg

trello.svg

502 ms

aws.svg

aws.svg

501 ms

slack.svg

slack.svg

503 ms

stripe.svg

stripe.svg

504 ms

product-1.png

product-1.png

506 ms

product-2.png

product-2.png

506 ms

product-3.png

product-3.png

506 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

21 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

28 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf

35 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3z.ttf

38 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxRSW3z.ttf

38 ms

dripicons-v2.woff

dripicons-v2.woff

306 ms

js

js

49 ms

anchor

anchor

40 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

21 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

3 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

11 ms

HmZh1vhaUdpb_7EqwA747OTURCPpYZjno-lluZU0IlU.js

HmZh1vhaUdpb_7EqwA747OTURCPpYZjno-lluZU0IlU.js

17 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

48 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

11 ms

Accessibility Review

securepaymentz.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

securepaymentz.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

securepaymentz.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securepaymentz.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securepaymentz.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

securepaymentz.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Securepaymentz. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: