Tools & Wizards About Us
shaleshakerscreen.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

shaleshakerscreen.com

Shale Shaker Screens for Oil Field and Coal Projects

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

379 ms

shaleshakerscreen.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Shale Shaker Screen content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shaleshakerscreen.com

We supply shale shaker screens, Shengjia shale shaker, hook strip pyramid screen and frame screen, used in oil field and sand control, coal mine and filter liquid.

Visit shaleshakerscreen.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shaleshakerscreen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shaleshakerscreen.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.717

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shaleshakerscreen.com

121 ms

www.shaleshakerscreen.com

328 ms

bootstrap.min.css

63 ms

font-awesome.min.css

124 ms

style.min.css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Shaleshakerscreen.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (351 ms) belongs to the original domain Shaleshakerscreen.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 165.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

986.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shaleshakerscreen.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 894.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 27.0 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 894.8 kB
  • After minification 891.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shale Shaker Screen images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 68.4 kB

  • Original 121.8 kB
  • After minification 121.3 kB
  • After compression 53.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 71.6 kB

  • Original 108.4 kB
  • After minification 105.7 kB
  • After compression 36.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shaleshakerscreen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (30%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shale Shaker Screen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

shaleshakerscreen.com

shaleshakerscreen.com

121 ms

www.shaleshakerscreen.com

www.shaleshakerscreen.com

328 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

63 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

124 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

233 ms

carousel.min.css

carousel.min.css

178 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

180 ms

pup.min.js

pup.min.js

183 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

245 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

183 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

320 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

243 ms

carousel.min.js

carousel.min.js

253 ms

logo.png

logo.png

80 ms

framed-flat-shale-shaker-screen.jpg

framed-flat-shale-shaker-screen.jpg

235 ms

hook-strip-flat-screen-black.jpg

hook-strip-flat-screen-black.jpg

233 ms

wedge-wire-screens.jpg

wedge-wire-screens.jpg

237 ms

crimped-wire-screen-mesh.jpg

crimped-wire-screen-mesh.jpg

293 ms

backslant-home-top.svg

backslant-home-top.svg

118 ms

farrey-shale-shaker-screen.jpg

farrey-shale-shaker-screen.jpg

123 ms

frame_flat_screen-2.jpg

frame_flat_screen-2.jpg

171 ms

frame-flat-shale-shaker-screen.jpg

frame-flat-shale-shaker-screen.jpg

182 ms

urethane-shale-shaker-screen.jpg

urethane-shale-shaker-screen.jpg

231 ms

application-1.jpg

application-1.jpg

242 ms

david.jpg

david.jpg

291 ms

jason.jpg

jason.jpg

291 ms

latonia.jpg

latonia.jpg

294 ms

gavin.jpg

gavin.jpg

296 ms

maddox.jpg

maddox.jpg

302 ms

malloy.jpg

malloy.jpg

351 ms

backslant-footer.svg

backslant-footer.svg

349 ms

logo.png

logo.png

351 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

275 ms

Accessibility Review

shaleshakerscreen.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

shaleshakerscreen.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

shaleshakerscreen.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shaleshakerscreen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shaleshakerscreen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shaleshakerscreen.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shale Shaker Screen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: