Tools & Wizards About Us
sharkprod.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

sharkprod.com

Sharkprod - Production Service in Monaco, French Riviera & Corsica

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

794 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

190 ms

sharkprod.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sharkprod.com now to see the best up-to-date Sharkprod content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sharkprod.com

Sharkprod is an Executive Production Service Company, based in Monaco. We welcome companies for producing film and photo shoots in the French Riviera.

Visit sharkprod.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sharkprod.com page load time and found that the first response time was 794 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sharkprod.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sharkprod.com

794 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

166 ms

lcweb.lightbox.css

202 ms

style.min.css

201 ms

styles.css

196 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Sharkprod.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (844 ms) belongs to the original domain Sharkprod.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 188.5 kB (21%)

Content Size

910.3 kB

After Optimization

721.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sharkprod.com main page is 910.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 303.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 123.4 kB

  • Original 146.7 kB
  • After minification 145.1 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 792 B

  • Original 247.8 kB
  • After minification 247.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sharkprod images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 39.6 kB

  • Original 303.0 kB
  • After minification 303.0 kB
  • After compression 263.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.6 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 212.9 kB
  • After minification 212.9 kB
  • After compression 188.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sharkprod.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (84%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sharkprod. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sharkprod.com

www.sharkprod.com

794 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

166 ms

lcweb.lightbox.css

lcweb.lightbox.css

202 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

201 ms

styles.css

styles.css

196 ms

uaf.css

uaf.css

199 ms

rgs.css

rgs.css

199 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

265 ms

style.css

style.css

292 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

295 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

403 ms

ascend.css

ascend.css

297 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

394 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

466 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

391 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

343 ms

galleria.ggallery_minimal.css

galleria.ggallery_minimal.css

334 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

537 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

431 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

432 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

432 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

440 ms

wp-a11y.min.js

wp-a11y.min.js

503 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

530 ms

wpss-search-suggest.js

wpss-search-suggest.js

529 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

529 ms

priority.js

priority.js

546 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

603 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

625 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

724 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

627 ms

init.js

init.js

844 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

641 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

699 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

724 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

724 ms

lcweb.lightbox.min.js

lcweb.lightbox.min.js

740 ms

style.css

style.css

788 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

28 ms

sharkprod-logo-final.png

sharkprod-logo-final.png

101 ms

sharkprod-logo-final-white.png

sharkprod-logo-final-white.png

102 ms

big-rollsroyce-1.jpg

big-rollsroyce-1.jpg

318 ms

collect

collect

238 ms

150204042304Nationale-Regular.woff

150204042304Nationale-Regular.woff

239 ms

140810034154Nationale-Light.woff

140810034154Nationale-Light.woff

233 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

230 ms

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

428 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

226 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

228 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

721 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

231 ms

js

js

264 ms

galleria.ggallery.js

galleria.ggallery.js

225 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

290 ms

Accessibility Review

sharkprod.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sharkprod.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

sharkprod.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharkprod.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sharkprod.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sharkprod.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sharkprod. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: