4.4 sec in total
199 ms
3.8 sec
338 ms
Click here to check amazing Sherpafit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sherpafit.com
Where you will come to expect the greatest personal training team dedicated to your goals, your journey, your experience. Westport, CT
Visit sherpafit.comWe analyzed Sherpafit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sherpafit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
199 ms
384 ms
117 ms
307 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Sherpafit.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sherpafit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 269.6 kB (22%)
1.3 MB
981.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sherpafit.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 498.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 159.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sherpafit needs image optimization as it can save up to 159.9 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sherpafit.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (80%)
85
17
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sherpafit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sherpafit.com
199 ms
www.sherpafit.com
384 ms
js
117 ms
style.min.css
307 ms
mappress.css
40 ms
style.css
38 ms
style.css
338 ms
nectar-slider.css
344 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
341 ms
style.css
53 ms
grid-system.css
50 ms
style.css
62 ms
css
58 ms
responsive.css
359 ms
ascend.css
365 ms
menu-dynamic.css
600 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
650 ms
js_composer.min.css
665 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
674 ms
style.css
716 ms
css
58 ms
tablepress-responsive.min.css
374 ms
jquery.min.js
384 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
687 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
607 ms
wpgmza_data.js
963 ms
css
53 ms
formreset.min.css
655 ms
formsmain.min.css
664 ms
readyclass.min.css
990 ms
browsers.min.css
681 ms
style-non-critical.css
1051 ms
magnific.css
682 ms
core.css
688 ms
core.min.js
696 ms
menu.min.js
695 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
703 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1056 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1067 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1066 ms
hooks.min.js
987 ms
api.js
61 ms
i18n.min.js
988 ms
a11y.min.js
1269 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1019 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
1010 ms
ctct-plugin-recaptcha-v2.min.js
1270 ms
ctct-plugin-frontend.min.js
989 ms
js
90 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
collect
29 ms
collect
49 ms
anime.min.js
1012 ms
nectar-slider.js
729 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
980 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1076 ms
priority.js
828 ms
nectar-slider-priority.js
849 ms
intersection-observer.min.js
842 ms
transit.min.js
832 ms
waypoints.js
925 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
1007 ms
hoverintent.min.js
964 ms
magnific.js
977 ms
superfish.js
977 ms
init.js
1148 ms
touchswipe.min.js
855 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
862 ms
jquery.json.min.js
879 ms
gravityforms.min.js
893 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
899 ms
gfsignature_delete_signature.min.js
901 ms
collect
87 ms
logo-sherpa-fitness.png
636 ms
sherpa-fit-group-sessions.png
934 ms
sherpa-fit-cycling.png
931 ms
sherpa-fit-personal-training.png
922 ms
sherpa-fit-beyond-the-gym.png
937 ms
grid.png
971 ms
vid-place-1.jpg
1294 ms
topo1.png
1398 ms
collect
156 ms
js
155 ms
font
148 ms
font
148 ms
icomoon.woff
1138 ms
font
214 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1351 ms
recaptcha__en.js
31 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
447 ms
sherpafit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sherpafit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sherpafit.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sherpafit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sherpafit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sherpafit.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sherpafit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: