2.6 sec in total
228 ms
1.9 sec
410 ms
Click here to check amazing Sherpafit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sherpafit.com
Where you will come to expect the greatest personal training team dedicated to your goals, your journey, your experience. Westport, CT
Visit sherpafit.comWe analyzed Sherpafit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
sherpafit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
228 ms
417 ms
100 ms
30 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Sherpafit.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (417 ms) belongs to the original domain Sherpafit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 100.9 kB (10%)
978.7 kB
877.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Sherpafit.com main page is 978.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 477.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sherpafit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sherpafit.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (84%)
77
12
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sherpafit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sherpafit.com
228 ms
www.sherpafit.com
417 ms
js
100 ms
style.min.css
30 ms
mappress.css
47 ms
style.css
49 ms
style.css
51 ms
nectar-slider.css
51 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
66 ms
style.css
65 ms
grid-system.css
59 ms
style.css
68 ms
css
94 ms
responsive.css
83 ms
ascend.css
86 ms
menu-dynamic.css
90 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
80 ms
js_composer.min.css
93 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
119 ms
style.css
132 ms
css
89 ms
tablepress-responsive.min.css
130 ms
jquery.min.js
142 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
128 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
127 ms
wpgmza_data.js
160 ms
css
91 ms
formreset.min.css
157 ms
formsmain.min.css
218 ms
readyclass.min.css
228 ms
browsers.min.css
223 ms
style-non-critical.css
225 ms
magnific.css
297 ms
core.css
229 ms
core.min.js
292 ms
menu.min.js
293 ms
dom-ready.min.js
293 ms
hooks.min.js
294 ms
i18n.min.js
319 ms
a11y.min.js
319 ms
autocomplete.min.js
320 ms
api.js
109 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
320 ms
ctct-plugin-recaptcha-v2.min.js
303 ms
ctct-plugin-frontend.min.js
289 ms
anime.min.js
290 ms
nectar-slider.js
293 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
284 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
274 ms
priority.js
270 ms
nectar-slider-priority.js
272 ms
intersection-observer.min.js
255 ms
transit.min.js
252 ms
waypoints.js
249 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
250 ms
hoverintent.min.js
246 ms
magnific.js
241 ms
superfish.js
209 ms
init.js
227 ms
touchswipe.min.js
224 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
214 ms
jquery.json.min.js
196 ms
gravityforms.min.js
195 ms
analytics.js
195 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
188 ms
gfsignature_delete_signature.min.js
182 ms
logo-sherpa-fitness.png
317 ms
grid.png
178 ms
vid-place-1.jpg
177 ms
topo1.png
174 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
176 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
177 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
307 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
307 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
312 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
314 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
312 ms
sherpa-fit-group-sessions.png
270 ms
sherpa-fit-cycling.png
247 ms
sherpa-fit-personal-training.png
245 ms
sherpa-fit-beyond-the-gym.png
244 ms
icomoon.woff
170 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
209 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
211 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf
210 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
247 ms
collect
148 ms
recaptcha__en.js
183 ms
js
138 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
146 ms
js
59 ms
sherpafit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sherpafit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sherpafit.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sherpafit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sherpafit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sherpafit.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sherpafit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: