Tools & Wizards About Us
shwj.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

shwj.com

Wealth Management | Denver, CO 2022 | SHJ Wealth Advisors

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

122 ms

shwj.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shwj.com homepage info - get ready to check Shwj best content right away, or after learning these important things about shwj.com

Plan for tomorrow. Enjoy today. Advisors who understand your values, goals and dreams. Clear Financial Plan. Comprehensive Investment Strategy. Confidence in Tomorrow. Do you find yourself concerned a...

Visit shwj.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shwj.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shwj.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,510 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shwj.com

133 ms

bt

109 ms

require.min.js

54 ms

main-r.min.js

60 ms

viewer.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Shwj.com, 61% (35 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (415 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (72%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

887.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shwj.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 110.2 kB

  • Original 132.0 kB
  • After minification 131.8 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 234.2 kB
  • After minification 217.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shwj images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB
  • After compression 639.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 44.1 kB

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shwj.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (82%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shwj. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.shwj.com

www.shwj.com

133 ms

bt

bt

109 ms

require.min.js

require.min.js

54 ms

main-r.min.js

main-r.min.js

60 ms

viewer.css

viewer.css

58 ms

dynamicmodel

dynamicmodel

51 ms

1bb9fd_c5f9daf7b4e0f8db01e564163e153493_745.json.z

1bb9fd_c5f9daf7b4e0f8db01e564163e153493_745.json.z

415 ms

1bb9fd_07565bdbe564eb94ac8b126e8ece6100_734.json.z

1bb9fd_07565bdbe564eb94ac8b126e8ece6100_734.json.z

394 ms

ugc-viewer

ugc-viewer

94 ms

bt

bt

100 ms

skins.min.js

skins.min.js

224 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

84 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

36 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

90 ms

react-with-addons.min.js

react-with-addons.min.js

82 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

78 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

79 ms

layout.min.js

layout.min.js

79 ms

tpa.min.js

tpa.min.js

82 ms

fonts.min.js

fonts.min.js

78 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

76 ms

swfobject.min.js

swfobject.min.js

79 ms

mousetrap.min.js

mousetrap.min.js

78 ms

tweenEngine.min.js

tweenEngine.min.js

77 ms

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

81 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

79 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

80 ms

widgets.min.js

widgets.min.js

78 ms

experiment.js

experiment.js

79 ms

render.min.js

render.min.js

79 ms

wixappsCore.min.js

wixappsCore.min.js

199 ms

wixappsClassics.min.js

wixappsClassics.min.js

198 ms

wixappsBuilder.min.js

wixappsBuilder.min.js

198 ms

zepto.min.js

zepto.min.js

193 ms

color.min.js

color.min.js

195 ms

react-dom-server.min.js

react-dom-server.min.js

104 ms

bt

bt

163 ms

dc.js

dc.js

148 ms

bt

bt

309 ms

shadowbottom.png

shadowbottom.png

129 ms

css

css

124 ms

latin.css

latin.css

125 ms

1bb9fd_6fb67590ea454420b04755b47cb85c2c.png

1bb9fd_6fb67590ea454420b04755b47cb85c2c.png

258 ms

1bb9fd_d1b1bb5490bb462887fec8b0f70224b5.jpg

1bb9fd_d1b1bb5490bb462887fec8b0f70224b5.jpg

252 ms

1bb9fd_ac86ddedc7884bfaa8397268f072dd12.jpg

1bb9fd_ac86ddedc7884bfaa8397268f072dd12.jpg

245 ms

1bb9fd_f03f4c8fc08a4b5fb347e0b1eb0178ab.jpg

1bb9fd_f03f4c8fc08a4b5fb347e0b1eb0178ab.jpg

263 ms

41d000_1cb62122b920e000743d930ea4ba7695.png

41d000_1cb62122b920e000743d930ea4ba7695.png

64 ms

bt

bt

53 ms

bt

bt

54 ms

bt

bt

53 ms

shiny2button_bg.png

shiny2button_bg.png

53 ms

arrows_white_new3.png

arrows_white_new3.png

53 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

50 ms

-KTKVm0Mx9ZCRXL9CXVIbT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

-KTKVm0Mx9ZCRXL9CXVIbT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

8 ms

I27Pb-wEGH2ajLYP0QrtSHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

I27Pb-wEGH2ajLYP0QrtSHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

8 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

8 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

8 ms

Accessibility Review

shwj.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shwj.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

shwj.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shwj.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shwj.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shwj.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shwj. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: