3 sec in total
176 ms
2.5 sec
413 ms
Visit siftgroups.com now to see the best up-to-date Sift Groups content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about siftgroups.com
Visit siftgroups.comWe analyzed Siftgroups.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
siftgroups.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.357
30/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
176 ms
594 ms
462 ms
394 ms
805 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Siftgroups.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to T.sharethis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (894 ms) relates to the external source Siftdigital.com.
Page size can be reduced by 463.8 kB (56%)
828.2 kB
364.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Siftgroups.com main page is 828.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 365.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sift Groups needs image optimization as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 146.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 146.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 214.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siftgroups.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 214.1 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (41%)
37
22
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sift Groups. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.siftdigital.co.uk
176 ms
www.siftdigital.com
594 ms
css_SV-c94HOyywCuMi8wU_z0nohfJKM1XO099UDISDAhtQ.css
462 ms
css_HG3zzCQWU_SgW-2fcU1aJNt2ZJ0xRhQWtQvjJfSZSNQ.css
394 ms
css_IWiNK11WV6FrL_F1jKX4BgVW2adLEaFvvZzC9dXefGA.css
805 ms
js_CNo5XlHyFB30gusOOzARjmshHqvAXSc-EkiTXKjww90.js
894 ms
js_F_3oaIUSKLcp4pFl3BWxN-LK7ipWPsLcUUuWY4jMQPo.js
428 ms
buttons.js
50 ms
who.js
396 ms
logo.png
153 ms
slider-right.png
172 ms
Cancer-Research-UK-thumb_05_05_05.png
171 ms
Amnesty-thumb_05_05.jpg
180 ms
Nokia-link_05_05.jpg
152 ms
footer-twb.png
169 ms
footer-sd-logo-white.png
170 ms
gtm.js
148 ms
sift-pattern-white.png
246 ms
grey-pattern.gif
232 ms
sd_logo.svg
182 ms
chevron-blue.png
238 ms
footer-pattern-blue.png
245 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
21 ms
Content-images_02_4.png
367 ms
c4352a95-7a41-48c1-83ce-d8ffd2a3b118.woff
114 ms
7658dda6-217a-406c-bcb8-7551f88e2c49.woff
251 ms
5a05cf7f-f332-456f-ae67-d8c26e0d35b3.woff
177 ms
939cba03-5b40-4d01-9bc5-7589eca863db.woff
351 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
266 ms
analytics.js
12 ms
getSegment.php
179 ms
checkOAuth.esi
18 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
71 ms
t.dhj
48 ms
who.ashx
104 ms
t.dhj
54 ms
cm
35 ms
x35248
111 ms
s-3271.xgi
13 ms
hbpix
44 ms
12 ms
14 ms
xrefid.xgi
14 ms
pixel
18 ms
pixel
15 ms
2981
24 ms
siftgroups.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
siftgroups.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
siftgroups.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siftgroups.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Siftgroups.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siftgroups.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sift Groups. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: