Tools & Wizards About Us
sigmafreight.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

sigmafreight.com

Freight Management and Warehousing for your business - Sigma Freight

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

921 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

347 ms

sigmafreight.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sigmafreight.com now to see the best up-to-date Sigma Freight content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sigmafreight.com

We specialise in offering system solutions designed specifically for your business whether that is Freight Forwarding, Logistics or Warehousing.

Visit sigmafreight.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sigmafreight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 921 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sigmafreight.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.87

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sigmafreight.com

921 ms

css

34 ms

css

52 ms

css

57 ms

application.css

717 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Sigmafreight.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (921 ms) belongs to the original domain Sigmafreight.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 659.8 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

686.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sigmafreight.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 843.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 45.8 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.0 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 263.9 kB
  • After minification 234.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sigma Freight needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 427.6 kB

  • Original 843.1 kB
  • After minification 812.6 kB
  • After compression 415.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 427.6 kB or 51% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 165.7 kB

  • Original 193.5 kB
  • After minification 177.5 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sigmafreight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 165.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (64%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sigma Freight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sigmafreight.com

sigmafreight.com

921 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

52 ms

css

css

57 ms

application.css

application.css

717 ms

ui.css

ui.css

385 ms

angular.min.js

angular.min.js

645 ms

angular-sanitize.min.js

angular-sanitize.min.js

423 ms

jquery-1.9.0.min.js

jquery-1.9.0.min.js

569 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

806 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

545 ms

jquery.validate.additional-methods.js

jquery.validate.additional-methods.js

590 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

628 ms

justice.min.js

justice.min.js

652 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

676 ms

smooth-scroll.min.js

smooth-scroll.min.js

713 ms

application.js

application.js

745 ms

js

js

76 ms

view.home.bolt-on.js

view.home.bolt-on.js

746 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

hotjar-1843.js

hotjar-1843.js

164 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

110 ms

logo-neu-240.png

logo-neu-240.png

148 ms

logo-neu.png

logo-neu.png

147 ms

sigma_logo.png

sigma_logo.png

130 ms

sigma_logo_modules.png

sigma_logo_modules.png

106 ms

sigma_logo_support.png

sigma_logo_support.png

104 ms

sigma_logo_transparent.png

sigma_logo_transparent.png

129 ms

sigma_logo_transparent_text.png

sigma_logo_transparent_text.png

129 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

88 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

102 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

103 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

102 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

67 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

66 ms

view.home.json

view.home.json

122 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

21 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

57 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

fm3_product_presentation_newdashnewcostnewjob.png

fm3_product_presentation_newdashnewcostnewjob.png

308 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

160 ms

Accessibility Review

sigmafreight.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sigmafreight.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sigmafreight.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigmafreight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sigmafreight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sigmafreight.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sigma Freight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: