Tools & Wizards About Us
sionic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

sionic.com

Consulting - Davies

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

355 ms

sionic.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sionic.com now to see the best up-to-date Sionic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sionic.com

Accelerating business, technology and people performance across financial services, banking, asset & wealth management, insurance and highly regulated industries.

Visit sionic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sionic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sionic.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,210 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sionic.com

79 ms

style.css

19 ms

style.min.css

29 ms

theme.css

87 ms

style.css

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Sionic.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (391 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.4 kB (42%)

Content Size

374.9 kB

After Optimization

217.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sionic.com main page is 374.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 154.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 133.9 kB

  • Original 154.7 kB
  • After minification 148.0 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 22.1 kB

  • Original 113.0 kB
  • After minification 90.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sionic needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 107.2 kB
  • After minification 107.2 kB
  • After compression 105.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (84%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sionic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sionic.com

www.sionic.com

79 ms

style.css

style.css

19 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

29 ms

theme.css

theme.css

87 ms

style.css

style.css

95 ms

style.css

style.css

32 ms

style.css

style.css

37 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

103 ms

wppopups-base.css

wppopups-base.css

48 ms

style.css

style.css

52 ms

theme.css

theme.css

84 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

38 ms

iubenda_cs.js

iubenda_cs.js

44 ms

Popup.js

Popup.js

84 ms

PopupConfig.js

PopupConfig.js

87 ms

PopupBuilder.js

PopupBuilder.js

88 ms

js

js

88 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

86 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

191 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

88 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

90 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

91 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

91 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

90 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

212 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

98 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

95 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

99 ms

wppopups.js

wppopups.js

183 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

185 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

184 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

223 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

185 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

186 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

186 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

86 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

186 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

176 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

162 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

184 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

178 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

174 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

90 ms

logo__sionic.svg

logo__sionic.svg

121 ms

icon__loupe.svg

icon__loupe.svg

174 ms

icon__close.svg

icon__close.svg

119 ms

4634957941-Sionic-Digital-rebrand-Website-Popup-V3.jpg

4634957941-Sionic-Digital-rebrand-Website-Popup-V3.jpg

122 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

370 ms

xbp1bug.js

xbp1bug.js

214 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

391 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

350 ms

js

js

328 ms

icon__loupe.svg

icon__loupe.svg

168 ms

icon__close.svg

icon__close.svg

158 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

184 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

4 ms

d

d

181 ms

d

d

182 ms

d

d

206 ms

d

d

202 ms

d

d

255 ms

d

d

255 ms

d

d

204 ms

d

d

202 ms

d

d

202 ms

d

d

253 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

109 ms

collect

collect

46 ms

Accessibility Review

sionic.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sionic.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

sionic.com SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sionic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sionic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sionic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sionic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: