5.5 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.1 sec
320 ms
Click here to check amazing Site Ladder content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about siteladder.com
Why Choose Us? Get Started Today SiteLadder achieved outstanding results for my site in a very short period of time and educated me throughout the entire process. Josh Gonzalez, Green Street Realty
Visit siteladder.comWe analyzed Siteladder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
siteladder.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
1070 ms
39 ms
71 ms
137 ms
442 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Siteladder.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Siteladder.com.
Page size can be reduced by 853.9 kB (63%)
1.4 MB
503.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Siteladder.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 598.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Site Ladder images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 416.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 416.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 367.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siteladder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 367.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (58%)
64
27
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Site Ladder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
siteladder.com
1070 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
71 ms
ctt-module-design.css
137 ms
styles.css
442 ms
settings.css
1453 ms
child-pages-shortcode.min.css
1457 ms
bootstrap.min.css
2523 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
138 ms
font-awesome.min.css
202 ms
lightbox.css
203 ms
vivify.css
270 ms
style.css
272 ms
style.php
753 ms
css
34 ms
jetpack.css
339 ms
jquery.js
474 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
504 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
608 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
638 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
679 ms
child-pages-shortcode.min.js
705 ms
acad.min.js
747 ms
retina.js
772 ms
comment-reply.min.js
812 ms
ctt-script.js
813 ms
jquery.form.min.js
838 ms
scripts.js
879 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
24 ms
gprofiles.js
53 ms
wpgroho.js
879 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
904 ms
bootstrap.min.js
947 ms
vivify.js
946 ms
plugins.js
970 ms
lightbox.min.js
1013 ms
twitter.js
1508 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1035 ms
e-201611.js
19 ms
collect
12 ms
siteladder.jpg
119 ms
slidebg2.jpg
119 ms
bulb.png
120 ms
idea.png
406 ms
checkmark.png
120 ms
point.png
121 ms
twitter1.png
406 ms
screen.png
407 ms
report.png
410 ms
clock.png
406 ms
played.png
408 ms
bullseye.png
407 ms
our-clients.png
410 ms
icon18.png
408 ms
icon22.png
408 ms
icon33.png
409 ms
search-engine-logos.png
464 ms
bg-twitter.png
380 ms
bg-phone.png
381 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
347 ms
hovercard.css
27 ms
services.css
53 ms
loader.gif
69 ms
shadow3.png
70 ms
large_left.png
70 ms
large_right.png
71 ms
g.gif
3 ms
siteladder.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
siteladder.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
siteladder.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siteladder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Siteladder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siteladder.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Site Ladder. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: