7.8 sec in total
387 ms
6.3 sec
1.1 sec
Visit sitest.jp now to see the best up-to-date Si Test content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sitest.jp
「SiTest(サイテスト)」 は世界初の人工知能を搭載した「AIレポート、スマートレポート」を搭載し、さらに8種類ものヒートマップ解析ツール、4種類のスプリットテスト、EFO対策機能を搭載した、UI/UX 改善のオールインワンシステムです。日本製で高機能なのに低価格を実現!スマホにも対応。
Visit sitest.jpWe analyzed Sitest.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 387 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sitest.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value17.7 s
0/100
10%
Value2,600 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value35.9 s
0/100
10%
387 ms
834 ms
218 ms
223 ms
247 ms
Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Sitest.jp, 15% (18 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Sitest.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 190.1 kB (9%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Sitest.jp main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.7 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Si Test images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitest.jp has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (41%)
111
66
The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Si Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sitest.jp
387 ms
sitest.jp
834 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
218 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.css
223 ms
common.css
247 ms
index.css
261 ms
sub-register.css
220 ms
offer_box.css
240 ms
all.css
47 ms
slick.css
412 ms
html5.js
415 ms
prelude-browser.js
443 ms
jquery.1.11.3.min.js
993 ms
jquery.animate.js
831 ms
jquery.leanModal.min.js
457 ms
jquery.validate.js
609 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
650 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
640 ms
slick.min.js
683 ms
platform.js
51 ms
contents-async.js
803 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.min.js
835 ms
velocity.min.js
887 ms
agent.js
880 ms
concat-common.js
1046 ms
concat-unique.js
1051 ms
top-animation.js
1050 ms
widgets.js
41 ms
api.js
63 ms
css
38 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
213 ms
gtm.js
298 ms
installations_transparent.png
287 ms
firstview_triangle@3x.png
286 ms
firstview_right@3x.png
622 ms
logos_slick_1.png
526 ms
logos_slick_2.png
468 ms
top_banner-hover.png
341 ms
top_banner.png
553 ms
top_layout_bg@3x.png
480 ms
point_list-improvement.webp
1796 ms
point_list_head-improvement.png
674 ms
point_list-cost.webp
1790 ms
point_list_head-cost.png
766 ms
point_list-convenient.webp
1657 ms
point_list_head-convenient.png
871 ms
point_list-teams.webp
1849 ms
point_list_head-teams.png
928 ms
intermediate_sales_copy.png
1103 ms
functions_list_head-heatmap.png
1129 ms
functions_list-heatmap.png
1309 ms
functions_list_head-split_experiments.png
1330 ms
functions_list-split_experiments.png
1513 ms
functions_list_head-efo.png
1530 ms
functions_list-efo.png
1715 ms
intermediate_banner-hover.png
1762 ms
intermediate_banner.png
1914 ms
ul.jpg
1954 ms
feature1.jpg
1968 ms
help.jpg
2053 ms
pc_cta_ga4.png
2418 ms
dx_promotion_bg.svg
2069 ms
dx_promotion1.png
2360 ms
dx_promotion2.png
2300 ms
dx_promotion3.png
2359 ms
dx_promotion4.png
2469 ms
dx_promotion1-sp.png
2348 ms
dx_promotion2-sp.png
2353 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
113 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
166 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff
200 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff
201 ms
recaptcha__en.js
172 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
81 ms
2984 ms
2972 ms
settings
121 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2696 ms
dx_promotion_logo-sp.svg
2173 ms
dx_promotion3-sp.png
2291 ms
timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js
3 ms
SiTest_heatmap
176 ms
dx_promotion4-sp.png
2207 ms
new.svg
2293 ms
to_sitest_banner.png
2357 ms
polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js
5 ms
runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js
35 ms
modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js
40 ms
main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js
53 ms
_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js
74 ms
%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js
79 ms
_buildManifest.js
92 ms
_ssgManifest.js
93 ms
to_sitest_banner_hover.png
2301 ms
8526.0c32a8f0cfc5749221a3.js
15 ms
7651.a95a6a76dc7859214377.js
15 ms
to_sitest_banner_sp.png
2349 ms
8283.f3e5048cca7cef5eed7f.js
3 ms
3077.44bfeb00af01bc4020f6.js
13 ms
1362.42d432e02f7980bca032.js
12 ms
4956.c4e51ef593974b9db0bb.js
13 ms
5893.d500bd2a89ded806aa73.js
7 ms
online_seminar_banner.png
2630 ms
online_seminar_banner_hover.png
2384 ms
online_seminar_banner_sp.png
2467 ms
isms.jpg
2358 ms
logo_gn.png
2146 ms
logo_gn_nega.png
2139 ms
navimg-heatmap.png
2004 ms
navimg-test.png
2126 ms
navimg-efo.png
2014 ms
navimg-lpo-cro.png
1974 ms
navimg-analyze.png
1943 ms
navimg-medium.png
1931 ms
navimg-ga4.png
1980 ms
navimg-direction.png
2012 ms
navimg-ads.png
1960 ms
badge_blog_gn.png
1938 ms
common_navi_menu_open.png
1949 ms
common_navi_scroll_menu_close.png
1871 ms
logo_footer.png
1905 ms
icon-X.svg
1758 ms
sitest.jp accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sitest.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sitest.jp SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitest.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sitest.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sitest.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Si Test. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: