1.1 sec in total
84 ms
956 ms
95 ms
Visit skipworth.net now to see the best up-to-date Skipworth content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about skipworth.net
Visit skipworth.netWe analyzed Skipworth.net page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
skipworth.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
84 ms
104 ms
98 ms
167 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Skipworth.net, 32% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 334.3 kB (47%)
712.5 kB
378.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Skipworth.net main page is 712.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 418.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 327.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 327.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Skipworth needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (27%)
37
27
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Skipworth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.skipworth.net
84 ms
minified.js
104 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
98 ms
polyfill.min.js
167 ms
thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js
208 ms
main.317ed945.bundle.min.js
208 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
207 ms
lodash.min.js
207 ms
react.production.min.js
208 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
211 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
208 ms
Skipworth%20%26%20Associates%20LLC%20logo_edited.png
229 ms
bundle.min.js
103 ms
login.png
267 ms
4bc378_ca864a1d009d4b4484525f66bec57dfef000.jpg
327 ms
9441146dbd3b4a31a35f513916b26942.jpg
79 ms
11062b_a08e2a290da745ce8181d333cfa32ee6~mv2.jpg
171 ms
11062b_9c36353a6cee4af8ba4dbcb7b46d16ba~mv2.jpeg
198 ms
taxation.png
218 ms
11062b_9c36353a6cee4af8ba4dbcb7b46d16ba~mv2.jpeg
279 ms
advice.png
388 ms
valuation.png
371 ms
124 ms
135 ms
133 ms
142 ms
143 ms
140 ms
155 ms
161 ms
165 ms
169 ms
165 ms
160 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
22 ms
bolt-performance
25 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
13 ms
right-arrow.svg
11 ms
skipworth.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
skipworth.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
skipworth.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Skipworth.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Skipworth.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
skipworth.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Skipworth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: