Tools & Wizards About Us
slimedica.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

slimedica.com

Weight Loss Clinic San Antonio | Aesthetics San Antonio | SliMedica

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

316 ms

slimedica.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to slimedica.com homepage info - get ready to check Sli Medica best content right away, or after learning these important things about slimedica.com

SliMedica is San Antonio's #1 location for health, beauty, and anti-aging treatments including laser weight loss, Kybella, Botox, Fillers, Laser Hair Removal, Vampire Facials, acne treatment and ...

Visit slimedica.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Slimedica.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slimedica.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

slimedica.com

144 ms

slimedica.com

221 ms

fbevents.js

36 ms

js

74 ms

style.min.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Slimedica.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (751 ms) belongs to the original domain Slimedica.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 93.2 kB (13%)

Content Size

736.5 kB

After Optimization

643.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Slimedica.com main page is 736.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 472.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 78.7 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 77.3 kB
  • After minification 77.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sli Medica images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 472.7 kB
  • After minification 472.5 kB
  • After compression 449.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 104.2 kB
  • After minification 104.1 kB
  • After compression 98.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slimedica.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (84%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sli Medica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

slimedica.com

slimedica.com

144 ms

slimedica.com

slimedica.com

221 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

36 ms

js

js

74 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

27 ms

olark-wp-public.css

olark-wp-public.css

32 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

57 ms

featherlight.min.css

featherlight.min.css

98 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

60 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

61 ms

olark-wp-public.js

olark-wp-public.js

68 ms

revolution.tools.min.js

revolution.tools.min.js

61 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

82 ms

featherlight.min.js

featherlight.min.js

142 ms

t.js

t.js

60 ms

owlcarousel.css

owlcarousel.css

64 ms

owlcarousel-theme.css

owlcarousel-theme.css

81 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

82 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

86 ms

style.css

style.css

92 ms

media.css

media.css

154 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

54 ms

timepicker.css

timepicker.css

93 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

58 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

154 ms

timepicker.js

timepicker.js

162 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

61 ms

jquery.scrollme.min.js

jquery.scrollme.min.js

153 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

154 ms

jquery.flipbook.js

jquery.flipbook.js

154 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

154 ms

custom-scripts.js

custom-scripts.js

162 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

160 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

159 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

158 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

175 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

180 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

174 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

171 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

165 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

180 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

177 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

183 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

173 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

163 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

153 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

143 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

153 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

141 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

150 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

148 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

147 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

133 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

141 ms

helper.min.js

helper.min.js

149 ms

owlcarousel.js

owlcarousel.js

139 ms

loader.js

loader.js

57 ms

css

css

39 ms

css

css

57 ms

css

css

115 ms

css

css

61 ms

menu-closs-icon.jpg

menu-closs-icon.jpg

34 ms

menu-btn.jpg

menu-btn.jpg

21 ms

drop-down-arrow.png

drop-down-arrow.png

93 ms

saliving.png

saliving.png

93 ms

SA-Live-Logo.png

SA-Live-Logo.png

21 ms

daytime-at-nine.png

daytime-at-nine.png

93 ms

183

183

340 ms

23

23

431 ms

more-btn.png

more-btn.png

159 ms

185

185

619 ms

app.js

app.js

18 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQg.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQg.ttf

133 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmDuXMQg.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmDuXMQg.ttf

138 ms

6695-481-10-8391.js

6695-481-10-8391.js

62 ms

21

21

503 ms

39

39

700 ms

26

26

598 ms

28

28

735 ms

29

29

751 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

218 ms

-W__XJn-UDDA2RCKYNoY.ttf

-W__XJn-UDDA2RCKYNoY.ttf

94 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

95 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

95 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

90 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

94 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

191 ms

loader.js

loader.js

160 ms

w.js

w.js

159 ms

c

c

239 ms

application2.js

application2.js

70 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

60 ms

call-tracking_9.js

call-tracking_9.js

6 ms

wcm

wcm

33 ms

storage.html

storage.html

3 ms

storage.js

storage.js

4 ms

settings.luckyorange.net

settings.luckyorange.net

30 ms

visits

visits

90 ms

clickstream.legacy.js

clickstream.legacy.js

76 ms

log.png

log.png

102 ms

Accessibility Review

slimedica.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

slimedica.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

slimedica.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slimedica.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slimedica.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

slimedica.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sli Medica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: