Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

smithjankerman.id

SLOTINDO62 >> RTP LIVE SLOT DILENGKAPI SLOT DEMO TERLENGKAP, TERTINGGI DAN PALING AKURAT

Page Load Speed

549 ms in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

494 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

smithjankerman.id screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Smithjankerman content for Indonesia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about smithjankerman.id

RTP Live slotindo62 terlengkap di lengkapi slot demo untuk semua provider dan terupdate yang bisa di mainkan para member setiap hari hari ini paling akurat hingga 98.7% serta RTP slot online terlengka...

Visit smithjankerman.id

Key Findings

We analyzed Smithjankerman.id page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 494 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smithjankerman.id performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smithjankerman.id

55 ms

www.thepoolarea.com

63 ms

www.realprivacy.io

336 ms

v0.js

27 ms

amp-carousel-0.1.js

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Smithjankerman.id, 50% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org and 17% (1 request) were made to Thepoolarea.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (336 ms) relates to the external source Realprivacy.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 70.9 kB (38%)

Content Size

187.1 kB

After Optimization

116.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Smithjankerman.id main page is 187.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 101.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 70.8 kB

  • Original 85.4 kB
  • After minification 85.1 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 101.7 kB
  • After minification 101.7 kB
  • After compression 101.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smithjankerman. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

smithjankerman.id accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

smithjankerman.id best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

smithjankerman.id SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smithjankerman.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smithjankerman.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smithjankerman. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: