Tools & Wizards About Us
webextractor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

webextractor.com

Web Data Extractor - Extract Email, URL, Meta Tag, Phone, Fax from Websites

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

172 ms

webextractor.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webextractor.com homepage info - get ready to check Web Extractor best content for Palestinian Territory right away, or after learning these important things about webextractor.com

Web Data Extractor is a powerful web data, link, url, email extractor tool - Popular utility for internet email marketing, mailing list management, site promotion and research.

Visit webextractor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webextractor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webextractor.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,260 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.386

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webextractor.com

141 ms

www.webextractor.com

111 ms

bootstrap.min.css

18 ms

owl.carousel.css

25 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Webextractor.com, 12% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (212 ms) relates to the external source Code.jivosite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

822.5 kB

After Optimization

779.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webextractor.com main page is 822.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 440.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 15.2 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 440.0 kB
  • After minification 432.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Extractor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 272.4 kB
  • After minification 272.4 kB
  • After compression 258.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 94.8 kB
  • After compression 85.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webextractor.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (47%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Extractor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webextractor.com

webextractor.com

141 ms

www.webextractor.com

www.webextractor.com

111 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

18 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

25 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

26 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

jquery.mmenu.all.css

23 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

43 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

32 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

32 ms

jquery.mmenu.min.all.js

jquery.mmenu.min.all.js

32 ms

script.js

script.js

31 ms

jsapi

jsapi

21 ms

loader.js

loader.js

19 ms

kve3zxNj2XI

kve3zxNj2XI

201 ms

ga.js

ga.js

14 ms

window.png

window.png

112 ms

bg-product-block.png

bg-product-block.png

138 ms

image_pro.png

image_pro.png

119 ms

icon-check.png

icon-check.png

110 ms

bg-prod-small-rad.png

bg-prod-small-rad.png

112 ms

bg-product-block-small.png

bg-product-block-small.png

116 ms

image82.png

image82.png

125 ms

bg-footer.png

bg-footer.png

128 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

carousel-nav.png

carousel-nav.png

14 ms

roboto-condensed-webfont.woff

roboto-condensed-webfont.woff

25 ms

roboto-bold-condensed-webfont.woff

roboto-bold-condensed-webfont.woff

23 ms

roboto-condensed-italic-webfont.woff

roboto-condensed-italic-webfont.woff

28 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

7 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

26 ms

base.js

base.js

50 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

134 ms

jRYISRuM9q7e_xyYaLp_fsq3qnLjbNevd8JDa-bOkpI.js

jRYISRuM9q7e_xyYaLp_fsq3qnLjbNevd8JDa-bOkpI.js

74 ms

embed.js

embed.js

36 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

119 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

122 ms

id

id

107 ms

Create

Create

22 ms

dwRkzFrABP

dwRkzFrABP

212 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

19 ms

Accessibility Review

webextractor.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

webextractor.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webextractor.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webextractor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webextractor.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

webextractor.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Extractor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: