3.8 sec in total
629 ms
2.9 sec
327 ms
Visit snapfish.no now to see the best up-to-date Snapfish content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about snapfish.no
Visit snapfish.noWe analyzed Snapfish.no page load time and found that the first response time was 629 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
snapfish.no performance score
629 ms
209 ms
235 ms
64 ms
408 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Snapfish.no, 4% (3 requests) were made to Promo.snapfish.co.uk and 4% (3 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Snapfish.plpt8.r-hosts.com.
Page size can be reduced by 321.1 kB (54%)
597.6 kB
276.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Snapfish.no main page is 597.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 388.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.5 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snapfish images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 251.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapfish.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (43%)
77
44
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snapfish. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
629 ms
reset.css
209 ms
styles.css
235 ms
jquery.min.js
64 ms
cufon.js
408 ms
Brandon_Regular.font.js
413 ms
Brandon_Medium.font.js
418 ms
Brandon_Bold.font.js
620 ms
Brandon_Light.font.js
634 ms
snapfish_logo.png
285 ms
spacer.gif
287 ms
flag_ie.gif
286 ms
flag_uk.gif
288 ms
flag_it.gif
289 ms
flag_at.gif
306 ms
flag_fr.gif
500 ms
flag_ch.gif
497 ms
flag_de.gif
500 ms
flag_us.gif
499 ms
amc.js
66 ms
sitecatalyst.js
95 ms
image_1.gif
525 ms
overlay_IE.png
456 ms
overlay_PT.png
586 ms
overlay_IT.png
585 ms
overlay_AT.png
607 ms
overlay_DK.png
621 ms
overlay_ES.png
686 ms
overlay_FR.png
791 ms
overlay_CH.png
802 ms
overlay_DE.png
816 ms
overlay_LU.png
822 ms
overlay_BE.png
832 ms
overlay_NL.png
882 ms
overlay_SI.png
973 ms
overlay_HR.png
1018 ms
overlay_HU.png
1015 ms
overlay_CZ.png
1017 ms
overlay_SK.png
1023 ms
overlay_PL.png
1072 ms
overlay_GR.png
1195 ms
overlay_BG.png
1204 ms
overlay_RO.png
1217 ms
overlay_BY.png
1230 ms
overlay_UA.png
1239 ms
overlay_RS.png
1285 ms
overlay_MD.png
1395 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
quant.js
12 ms
151 ms
fbds.js
146 ms
code.js
179 ms
utag.js
11 ms
tc.js
218 ms
realytics-1.2.min.js
21 ms
fbevents.js
216 ms
pixel;r=708241162;a=p-32BfFq-hUEG3U;labels=_fp.event.ptool%20EUShipping%20eushipping;fpan=1;fpa=P0-123077113-1458141953134;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458141953133;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpromo.snapfish.co.uk%2FEUShipping%2Feushipping%2F;ogl=
15 ms
utag.8.js
28 ms
cnktNW5wY2h0MG58cnlfM0E1RUZDMUItMTBBNy00QzAxLTkyMDEtQTAxMDYxQTMzNTU3fA%3D%3D
181 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
58 ms
overlay_LT.png
1238 ms
overlay_EE.png
1235 ms
overlay_CY.png
1243 ms
overlay_NO.png
1269 ms
overlay_SE.png
1342 ms
overlay_FI.png
1403 ms
ga-audiences
34 ms
144 ms
s38425159004982
117 ms
yieldify_1457450204.js
8 ms
campaigns.json
98 ms
45 ms
overlay_LV.png
1230 ms
overlay_MT.png
1222 ms
overlay_TR.png
1241 ms
geolocation.json
177 ms
yieldify-styles-min.css
24 ms
23 ms
snapfish.no SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapfish.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Snapfish.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snapfish.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snapfish. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: