3.6 sec in total
244 ms
3 sec
341 ms
Welcome to sparkcomputing.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Sparkcomputing best content right away, or after learning these important things about sparkcomputing.co.uk
Provide solutions for Sage, quickbook, Xerox and ecommerce integration and automation. Based in Shropshire UK
Visit sparkcomputing.co.ukWe analyzed Sparkcomputing.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sparkcomputing.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.8 s
0/100
10%
Value15.7 s
0/100
25%
Value16.3 s
0/100
10%
Value460 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.249
50/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
244 ms
465 ms
933 ms
48 ms
212 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sparkcomputing.co.uk, 82% (63 requests) were made to Vibeserve.co.uk and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (996 ms) relates to the external source Vibeserve.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (74%)
3.0 MB
780.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sparkcomputing.co.uk main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sparkcomputing needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 941.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 941.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sparkcomputing.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (75%)
68
17
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sparkcomputing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sparkcomputing.co.uk
244 ms
www.sparkcomputing.co.uk
465 ms
www.vibeserve.co.uk
933 ms
analytics.js
48 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
212 ms
layerslider.css
322 ms
css
49 ms
style.min.css
404 ms
styles.css
251 ms
style.css
252 ms
settings.css
363 ms
style.css
291 ms
plugins.min.css
334 ms
modules.min.css
725 ms
font-awesome.min.css
373 ms
style.min.css
400 ms
ionicons.min.css
492 ms
style.css
529 ms
simple-line-icons.css
454 ms
dripicons.css
479 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
484 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
533 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
559 ms
style_dynamic.css
566 ms
js_composer.min.css
889 ms
css
57 ms
jquery.min.js
696 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
615 ms
scrolltoplugin.min.js
638 ms
greensock.js
741 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
773 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
716 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
786 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
872 ms
js
46 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
38 ms
js
101 ms
animate.min.css
680 ms
scripts.js
681 ms
script.min.js
751 ms
core.min.js
749 ms
tabs.min.js
761 ms
accordion.min.js
761 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
996 ms
js
63 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
993 ms
ga-audiences
34 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
913 ms
mouse.min.js
874 ms
slider.min.js
874 ms
third-party.min.js
838 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
806 ms
smoothPageScroll.js
791 ms
modules.min.js
763 ms
comment-reply.min.js
753 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
740 ms
like.min.js
738 ms
waypoints.min.js
689 ms
sidearea.png
111 ms
vibeserve.png
126 ms
accounts-integration.jpg
132 ms
ecommerce-integration.jpg
263 ms
support.jpg
264 ms
Vibe-serve-computer-dashboard-1-2.jpg
264 ms
Xerox_2008_Logo-300x90.png
265 ms
Logo_Brightpearl-logo-Blue-full-e1506511615273-300x70.png
265 ms
quickbook-logo-300x57.png
265 ms
lgo_sage.png
265 ms
arrow.png
266 ms
font
29 ms
font
158 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
225 ms
ionicons.ttf
224 ms
font
227 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
226 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
226 ms
sparkcomputing.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sparkcomputing.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sparkcomputing.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sparkcomputing.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sparkcomputing.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sparkcomputing.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sparkcomputing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: