Tools & Wizards About Us
spicandspancleaningservice.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

spicandspancleaningservice.in

Bathroom Cleaning Service | House Cleaning Service | Sofa Cleaning Service | Carpet Cleaning Service | Disinfect Service | Marble Polishing Service

Page Load Speed

9.4 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

7.6 sec

Page Rendered

274 ms

spicandspancleaningservice.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Spicandspan Cleaning Service content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about spicandspancleaningservice.in

Spic & Span is always best in Bathroom Cleaning Service, House Cleaning Service, Sofa Cleaning Service, Carpet Cleaning Service, Disinfect Service, Marble Polishing Service

Visit spicandspancleaningservice.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Spicandspancleaningservice.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spicandspancleaningservice.in performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.1 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.spicandspancleaningservice.in

1532 ms

js

30 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

211 ms

style.min.css

421 ms

styles.css

421 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Spicandspancleaningservice.in, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Spicandspancleaningservice.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.7 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

973.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Spicandspancleaningservice.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 629.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 47.0 kB

  • Original 59.9 kB
  • After minification 56.6 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 96.9 kB

  • Original 629.7 kB
  • After minification 532.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Spicandspan Cleaning Service needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.9 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 339.6 kB
  • After minification 339.6 kB
  • After compression 332.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 104.1 kB

  • Original 198.6 kB
  • After minification 198.1 kB
  • After compression 94.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spicandspancleaningservice.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.1 kB or 52% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (84%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spicandspan Cleaning Service. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.spicandspancleaningservice.in

www.spicandspancleaningservice.in

1532 ms

js

js

30 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

211 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

421 ms

styles.css

styles.css

421 ms

dustar-elementor.css

dustar-elementor.css

431 ms

slick.css

slick.css

433 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

442 ms

venobox.css

venobox.css

446 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

630 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

629 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

646 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

869 ms

animate.css

animate.css

664 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

669 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

838 ms

slick.css

slick.css

838 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

874 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

884 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1117 ms

style.css

style.css

1049 ms

odometer.css

odometer.css

1049 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1086 ms

elements.css

elements.css

1087 ms

css

css

31 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1104 ms

style.css

style.css

1258 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

1258 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1303 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

1302 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1545 ms

post-396.css

post-396.css

1340 ms

post-11.css

post-11.css

1465 ms

css

css

33 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

1467 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1735 ms

app.js

app.js

1518 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1561 ms

plugin-scripts.js

plugin-scripts.js

1674 ms

js

js

61 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1675 ms

venobox.min.js

venobox.min.js

1610 ms

wpgs.js

wpgs.js

1400 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1401 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1458 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

1461 ms

fancybox.min.js

fancybox.min.js

1515 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

1513 ms

owl-carousel.js

owl-carousel.js

1363 ms

jquery-easing.js

jquery-easing.js

1416 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1452 ms

odometer.min.js

odometer.min.js

1436 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

1502 ms

slick-slider.js

slick-slider.js

1339 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1598 ms

wc-quantity-increment.js

wc-quantity-increment.js

1396 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1433 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1431 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1337 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1346 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

1404 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

1426 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1420 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

1481 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1360 ms

dustar-elementor.js

dustar-elementor.js

1397 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1413 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1421 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1393 ms

why-choose-bg.jpg

why-choose-bg.jpg

169 ms

embed

embed

252 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

1053 ms

hero-women.png

hero-women.png

1564 ms

about-shape.png

about-shape.png

1124 ms

cleaning-service-3591146_1280.png

cleaning-service-3591146_1280.png

1850 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

1170 ms

cta-bg.png

cta-bg.png

1599 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

1483 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf

17 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e0.ttf

24 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e0.ttf

29 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e0.ttf

29 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

1296 ms

7Aujp_0qiz-afTfcIyoiGtm2P0wG05Fz4eqVxg.ttf

7Aujp_0qiz-afTfcIyoiGtm2P0wG05Fz4eqVxg.ttf

29 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

1328 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

1516 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

1544 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

1579 ms

why-choose-bg.jpg

why-choose-bg.jpg

273 ms

js

js

53 ms

search.js

search.js

3 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

6 ms

main.js

main.js

10 ms

hero-static-bg-min.png

hero-static-bg-min.png

1089 ms

Accessibility Review

spicandspancleaningservice.in accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

spicandspancleaningservice.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

spicandspancleaningservice.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spicandspancleaningservice.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spicandspancleaningservice.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spicandspancleaningservice.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Spicandspan Cleaning Service. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: