2.6 sec in total
242 ms
2.3 sec
107 ms
Welcome to srushton.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check S Rushton best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about srushton.co.uk
Stuart Rushton & Company was formed in 1998 and has two offices in Knutsford, which serve the whole of the North Cheshire and South Manchester region.
Visit srushton.co.ukWe analyzed Srushton.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
srushton.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value1,390 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.569
12/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
242 ms
444 ms
244 ms
164 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Srushton.co.uk, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (799 ms) belongs to the original domain Srushton.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 363.0 kB (40%)
908.3 kB
545.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Srushton.co.uk main page is 908.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 458.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. S Rushton images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 122.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 198.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Srushton.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 198.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (71%)
38
11
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of S Rushton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
srushton.co.uk
242 ms
www.srushton.co.uk
444 ms
bootstrap.min.css
244 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
164 ms
bootstrap-extended.css
161 ms
template.css
170 ms
jquery.mmenu.all.css
167 ms
jquery.vegas.css
165 ms
jquery-ui.css
21 ms
multiple-select.css
320 ms
superfish.css
321 ms
superfish-vertical.css
321 ms
jquery.min.js
404 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
325 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
400 ms
caption.js
479 ms
bootstrap.min.js
480 ms
unoSlider.min.js
477 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.js
502 ms
jquery.vegas.js
559 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
562 ms
default.js
638 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
43 ms
jcombo_qs.js
638 ms
jquery.multiple.select.js
638 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js
639 ms
hoverIntent.js
717 ms
superfish.js
719 ms
css
23 ms
css
33 ms
css
43 ms
logo.png
240 ms
facebook2.png
162 ms
twitter2.png
163 ms
email.png
162 ms
valpal.png
163 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
70 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
70 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
71 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
71 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
71 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8xsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
71 ms
index.php
239 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
32 ms
loading.gif
242 ms
bg.jpg
799 ms
srushton.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
srushton.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
srushton.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Srushton.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Srushton.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
srushton.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of S Rushton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: