Tools & Wizards About Us
ssl.support screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

ssl.support

SSL Certificate Installation Service Provider |Instant SSL Support

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

244 ms

ssl.support screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ssl.support homepage info - get ready to check SSL best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about ssl.support

We offer SSL Certificate Installation service on all types of web servers,C-Panel, Firewall, Load Balancer, UCC server, VPN server with CSR generation. You just need to buy any package and we will ins...

Visit ssl.support

Key Findings

We analyzed Ssl.support page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ssl.support performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value960 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.19

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ssl.support

229 ms

www.ssl.support

197 ms

www.ssl.support

1838 ms

gtm.js

105 ms

css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Ssl.support, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ssl.support.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.9 kB (44%)

Content Size

196.3 kB

After Optimization

109.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ssl.support main page is 196.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 132.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 47.2 kB

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 38.8 kB

  • Original 132.9 kB
  • After minification 94.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SSL needs image optimization as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 852 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 769 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 852 B or 53% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (61%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SSL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ssl.support

ssl.support

229 ms

www.ssl.support

www.ssl.support

197 ms

www.ssl.support

www.ssl.support

1838 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

105 ms

css

css

70 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

98 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

136 ms

main.css

main.css

138 ms

custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css

custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css

197 ms

menu-style.css

menu-style.css

194 ms

custom.css

custom.css

212 ms

compact.https.css

compact.https.css

214 ms

step-process.css

step-process.css

206 ms

css

css

89 ms

css

css

90 ms

aos.css

aos.css

79 ms

css

css

92 ms

aos.js

aos.js

102 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

54 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

134 ms

script.js

script.js

202 ms

uikit.min.js

uikit.min.js

396 ms

uikit-icons.min.js

uikit-icons.min.js

396 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

280 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

66 ms

api.js

api.js

82 ms

jquery.viewbox.min.js

jquery.viewbox.min.js

269 ms

jquery.session.min.js

jquery.session.min.js

273 ms

bioep.min.js

bioep.min.js

273 ms

jquery.popupoverlay.js

jquery.popupoverlay.js

394 ms

css

css

24 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

132 ms

logo.png

logo.png

501 ms

box-bg.jpg

box-bg.jpg

540 ms

1560517825.png

1560517825.png

500 ms

1557309863.png

1557309863.png

500 ms

1557310059.png

1557310059.png

500 ms

1557310277.png

1557310277.png

500 ms

1557309962.png

1557309962.png

539 ms

1557309923.png

1557309923.png

560 ms

popular.png

popular.png

538 ms

free-ifetime-png1557313478.png

free-ifetime-png1557313478.png

539 ms

provide-remote-png1557313513.png

provide-remote-png1557313513.png

540 ms

support-png1557313583.png

support-png1557313583.png

601 ms

assistance-png1557313612.png

assistance-png1557313612.png

598 ms

dedicated-png1557313656.png

dedicated-png1557313656.png

603 ms

flexible-png1557313691.png

flexible-png1557313691.png

599 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

263 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

364 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-vNiXg7Q.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-vNiXg7Q.ttf

441 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

403 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

403 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

261 ms

widget

widget

943 ms

call-icon.png

call-icon.png

251 ms

Accessibility Review

ssl.support accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ssl.support best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ssl.support SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ssl.support can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ssl.support main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ssl.support

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SSL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: