Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

standermarine.net

Home Stander Marine Inc. Leland, MI (231) 256-9231

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

310 ms

standermarine.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stander Marine content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about standermarine.net

Home Stander Marine Inc. Leland, MI (231) 256-9231

Visit standermarine.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Standermarine.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

standermarine.net performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.263

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.standermarine.net

1645 ms

elastic-apm-rum.umd.min.js

86 ms

analytics.js

63 ms

font-awesome.min.css

60 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Standermarine.net, 38% (22 requests) were made to Cdnmedia.endeavorsuite.com and 19% (11 requests) were made to Published-assets.ari-build.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Cdnmedia.endeavorsuite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 647.7 kB (18%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Standermarine.net main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 73.8 kB

  • Original 93.9 kB
  • After minification 91.1 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stander Marine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 184.3 kB
  • After minification 178.1 kB
  • After compression 156.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 525.9 kB

  • Original 605.1 kB
  • After minification 603.2 kB
  • After compression 79.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Standermarine.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 525.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (50%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stander Marine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

standermarine.net accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

standermarine.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

standermarine.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Standermarine.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Standermarine.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stander Marine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: