Tools & Wizards About Us
starlite.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

starlite.in

The domain name Starlite.in is for sale

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

241 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

197 ms

starlite.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Starlite content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about starlite.in

The domain name Starlite.in is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.

Visit starlite.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Starlite.in page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starlite.in performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

starlite.in

241 ms

starlite.in

250 ms

starlite.in

245 ms

style.css

120 ms

bootstrap.min.css

214 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Starlite.in, 94% (32 requests) were made to Daaz.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (526 ms) relates to the external source Daaz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 70.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

316.3 kB

After Optimization

245.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Starlite.in main page is 316.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 146.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 60.3 kB

  • Original 69.0 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.1 kB, which is 49% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 146.6 kB
  • After minification 136.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starlite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 62.7 kB
  • After minification 62.7 kB
  • After compression 62.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 572 B

  • Original 38.0 kB
  • After minification 38.0 kB
  • After compression 37.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starlite.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (33%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starlite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

starlite.in

starlite.in

241 ms

starlite.in

starlite.in

250 ms

starlite.in

starlite.in

245 ms

style.css

style.css

120 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

214 ms

css2.css

css2.css

118 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

120 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

135 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

intlTelInput.min.css

121 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

117 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

36 ms

logo.png

logo.png

240 ms

paymentgateway-logos.svg

paymentgateway-logos.svg

230 ms

tooltip-icon.png

tooltip-icon.png

410 ms

medal-1.png

medal-1.png

238 ms

moneyback-guarantee-icon.png

moneyback-guarantee-icon.png

239 ms

trust-stamp.png

trust-stamp.png

325 ms

money-back-img1.png

money-back-img1.png

318 ms

money-back-img2.png

money-back-img2.png

326 ms

money-back-img3.png

money-back-img3.png

330 ms

faster-ownership-transfer-icon.png

faster-ownership-transfer-icon.png

340 ms

transper-img1.png

transper-img1.png

420 ms

transper-img2.png

transper-img2.png

425 ms

secure-payments-icon.png

secure-payments-icon.png

428 ms

secure-payment-img1.png

secure-payment-img1.png

429 ms

secure-payment-img2.png

secure-payment-img2.png

440 ms

twitterX.png

twitterX.png

519 ms

learn-more-w.png

learn-more-w.png

519 ms

installment-agreement-w.png

installment-agreement-w.png

526 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

300 ms

main.js

main.js

12 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

112 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

103 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

109 ms

Accessibility Review

starlite.in accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

starlite.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

starlite.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starlite.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starlite.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

starlite.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starlite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: