950 ms in total
17 ms
763 ms
170 ms
Welcome to sterlingpestcontrol.com homepage info - get ready to check Sterling Pest Control best content right away, or after learning these important things about sterlingpestcontrol.com
STERLING IS NOW PART OF CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
Visit sterlingpestcontrol.comWe analyzed Sterlingpestcontrol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 933 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
sterlingpestcontrol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value23.0 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value3,700 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value30.4 s
0/100
10%
17 ms
72 ms
69 ms
73 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sterlingpestcontrol.com, 27% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (334 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 94.9 kB (8%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Sterlingpestcontrol.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 986.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sterling Pest Control images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (62%)
21
8
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sterling Pest Control. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sterlingpestcontrol.com
17 ms
sterling
72 ms
H3_uUty1gYC56xtRJNFB7xGTVknO8sGCdmHbxf6qzeSfeTIIfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9oFRFq5QgqFQSoZcJDjR4KZAjDwA4Kwy7QMkG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0jhU8dAm0iYwlSemDifoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCHKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOeBDOcu8OeFCZAu8d1sDOWg8Sab0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOeFCZAu8d1sDSemDieFzd1skdh30jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCiaiaOcBDOcu8OYiaikoRdemlZAoXSku3ZWFXO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUaiaS0jhU8dAm0iYF3ZWFXjhN0iY4zdfoRdhXCiaiaO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8ShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXK2YgkdayTdAIldcNhjPJPjAszjc9lZhBkjAuzdcblSY4zH6qJn3IbMg6IJMJ7f6K3UMIbMg6BJMJ7fbKOMsMMeMS6MKG4fVwXIMIjgfMfqMYmrTkMg6.js
69 ms
css2
73 ms
legacy.js
56 ms
modern.js
65 ms
extract-css-runtime-2fabbf9455ccf2f0513f-min.en-US.js
60 ms
extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js
73 ms
cldr-resource-pack-32136deb9638cc6130b2-min.en-US.js
60 ms
common-vendors-stable-61293f01d648eef165fc-min.en-US.js
65 ms
common-vendors-550c62b5ee3ccd26e409-min.en-US.js
73 ms
common-03bb8897e193a825b938-min.en-US.js
82 ms
performance-811237e1adfb0a5866e3-min.en-US.js
64 ms
site.css
56 ms
aa74b417fa.js
79 ms
site-bundle.js
47 ms
gtm.js
62 ms
Clements+logo_with+tag+line.png
28 ms
Screenshot+2023-07-02+114012.png
334 ms
Screen+Shot+2020-07-20+at+8.33.00+AM.png
312 ms
Screen+Shot+2022-04-13+at+8.19.21+AM.png
17 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
21 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
25 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
30 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
33 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf
35 ms
kx7ufqazzo4dqdk7dfm6ecjezeqq2yun.js
143 ms
render.5091279ec8afd6570468.js
20 ms
d
3 ms
d
15 ms
d
14 ms
d
25 ms
p.gif
203 ms
sterlingpestcontrol.com accessibility score
sterlingpestcontrol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sterlingpestcontrol.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sterlingpestcontrol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sterlingpestcontrol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sterlingpestcontrol.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sterling Pest Control. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: