Tools & Wizards About Us
sterlingtree.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

sterlingtree.com

Tree Care | Lawn Care | Sterling Tree and Lawn | Long Island

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

175 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

863 ms

sterlingtree.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sterlingtree.com now to see the best up-to-date Sterling Tree content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sterlingtree.com

See why we are the area’s most trusted tree care and lawn care service. We offer professional tree care provided by our knowledgeable staff of specialists.

Visit sterlingtree.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sterlingtree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sterlingtree.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,710 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sterlingtree.com

175 ms

sterlingtree.com

1151 ms

css

52 ms

css

69 ms

style.min.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Sterlingtree.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sterlingtree.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 158.5 kB (1%)

Content Size

14.1 MB

After Optimization

13.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sterlingtree.com main page is 14.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 67.8 kB

  • Original 86.7 kB
  • After minification 80.9 kB
  • After compression 18.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 13.6 MB
  • After minification 13.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sterling Tree images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 72.1 kB

  • Original 409.4 kB
  • After minification 409.4 kB
  • After compression 337.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 72.1 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 54.1 kB
  • After minification 54.1 kB
  • After compression 49.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sterlingtree.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (60%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sterling Tree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sterlingtree.com

sterlingtree.com

175 ms

sterlingtree.com

sterlingtree.com

1151 ms

css

css

52 ms

css

css

69 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

75 ms

mobile-menu.css

mobile-menu.css

139 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

267 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

203 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

204 ms

style.css

style.css

205 ms

styles-2020.css

styles-2020.css

201 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

206 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

294 ms

mobile-menu.js

mobile-menu.js

293 ms

easing.js

easing.js

293 ms

ga-scroll-events.js

ga-scroll-events.js

299 ms

js

js

76 ms

g9nrqwtmiz.jsonp

g9nrqwtmiz.jsonp

36 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

49 ms

foundation.js

foundation.js

303 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

360 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

360 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

361 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

360 ms

theme-init.js

theme-init.js

360 ms

st-main.js

st-main.js

360 ms

jscripts-ftr2-min.js

jscripts-ftr2-min.js

439 ms

shield-notbot.bundle.js

shield-notbot.bundle.js

437 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

437 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

437 ms

load.sumome.com

load.sumome.com

43 ms

sumome.js

sumome.js

3 ms

swatch

swatch

59 ms

sterling-logos-color.svg

sterling-logos-color.svg

135 ms

shomershabbat.svg

shomershabbat.svg

138 ms

sterling-logos-w.svg

sterling-logos-w.svg

201 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

133 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xo.woff

134 ms

slider-feature-3.jpg

slider-feature-3.jpg

451 ms

slider-feature-1.jpg

slider-feature-1.jpg

514 ms

slider-feature-2.jpg

slider-feature-2.jpg

576 ms

2012-07-08-13.05.21_mini.jpg

2012-07-08-13.05.21_mini.jpg

418 ms

DSC_0087.jpg

DSC_0087.jpg

521 ms

DSC_0173.jpg

DSC_0173.jpg

450 ms

DSC_0069.jpg

DSC_0069.jpg

451 ms

DSC_0082.jpg

DSC_0082.jpg

519 ms

sterling-feature-thumb.jpg

sterling-feature-thumb.jpg

518 ms

DSC_0095.jpg

DSC_0095.jpg

578 ms

DSC_0167.jpg

DSC_0167.jpg

522 ms

DSC_0002.jpg

DSC_0002.jpg

579 ms

MercuryTextG1-Bold.woff

MercuryTextG1-Bold.woff

582 ms

MercuryTextG1-Roman.woff

MercuryTextG1-Roman.woff

590 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

591 ms

DSC_0173-lg.jpg

DSC_0173-lg.jpg

525 ms

DSC_0173-7.png

DSC_0173-7.png

517 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

61 ms

externalPlayer.js

externalPlayer.js

22 ms

videoThumbnail.js

videoThumbnail.js

32 ms

wistiaLogo.js

wistiaLogo.js

15 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

4 ms

e50748e7256cdc646f33fba1fcd19957.jpg

e50748e7256cdc646f33fba1fcd19957.jpg

352 ms

Accessibility Review

sterlingtree.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sterlingtree.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sterlingtree.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sterlingtree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sterlingtree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sterlingtree.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sterling Tree. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: