Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

stickygram.com

NameBright - Coming Soon

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

4.2 sec

stickygram.com screenshot

About Website

Visit stickygram.com now to see the best up-to-date Stickygram content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stickygram.com

Make stories from your photos. Print photos online or create personalised gifts with Photobox, the photo specialists. Photo Books, Prints, Canvases, more.

Visit stickygram.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stickygram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stickygram.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,560 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stickygram.com

248 ms

www.photobox.co.uk

159 ms

www.photobox.co.uk

1112 ms

bundle.js

398 ms

gtm.js

511 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stickygram.com, 48% (14 requests) were made to Smash-images.photobox.com and 24% (7 requests) were made to Cdn.photobox.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Photobox.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 783.2 kB (60%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

521.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Stickygram.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 885.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 782.2 kB

  • Original 885.4 kB
  • After minification 885.1 kB
  • After compression 103.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 782.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 937 B

  • Original 419.1 kB
  • After minification 418.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stickygram images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (33%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stickygram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

stickygram.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stickygram.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stickygram.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stickygram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stickygram.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stickygram. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: